IETF Logo Mail Archive

Re: [perpass] Commnets on draft-farrell-perpass-attack-00 was RE: perens-perpass-appropriate-response-01

Bruce Perens <bruce@perens.com> Wed, 04 December 2013 23:43 UTC

Return-Path: <bruce@perens.com>
X-Original-To: perpass@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: perpass@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id CA7C11AD9B8 for <perpass@ietfa.amsl.com>; Wed, 4 Dec 2013 15:43:49 -0800 (PST)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -1.177
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-1.177 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, HTML_MESSAGE=0.001, MIME_HTML_ONLY=0.723, RP_MATCHES_RCVD=-0.001] autolearn=no
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id YZP-OK3YeqeJ for <perpass@ietfa.amsl.com>; Wed, 4 Dec 2013 15:43:49 -0800 (PST)
Received: from alchemy.perens.com (alchemy.perens.com [206.221.219.26]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 16C9B1AD948 for <perpass@ietf.org>; Wed, 4 Dec 2013 15:43:49 -0800 (PST)
Received: from [192.168.18.131] (mail.a10networks.com [12.207.16.167]) by alchemy.perens.com (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id 2380050008A for <perpass@ietf.org>; Wed, 4 Dec 2013 15:43:46 -0800 (PST)
Message-ID: <529FBE36.5090009@perens.com>
Date: Wed, 04 Dec 2013 15:43:50 -0800
From: Bruce Perens <bruce@perens.com>
User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; Linux x86_64; rv:17.0) Gecko/20131103 Icedove/17.0.10
MIME-Version: 1.0
To: perpass@ietf.org
References: <290E20B455C66743BE178C5C84F1240847E5103799@EXMB01CMS.surrey.ac.uk> <2C66A416-5F07-4803-A4C0-BB61734BA42E@nominum.com> <529FB216.7010504@perens.com> <CAMm+Lwjyp2eiVyqujnxiad9+iqUjkbJDhshB3+g-8fWkwgc5Vg@mail.gmail.com> <529FBC5F.7050700@perens.com>
In-Reply-To: <529FBC5F.7050700@perens.com>
Content-Type: text/html; charset="ISO-8859-1"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Subject: Re: [perpass] Commnets on draft-farrell-perpass-attack-00 was RE: perens-perpass-appropriate-response-01
X-BeenThere: perpass@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.15
Precedence: list
List-Id: "The perpass list is for IETF discussion of pervasive monitoring. " <perpass.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/perpass>, <mailto:perpass-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://www.ietf.org/mail-archive/web/perpass/>
List-Post: <mailto:perpass@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:perpass-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/perpass>, <mailto:perpass-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 04 Dec 2013 23:43:50 -0000

On 12/04/2013 03:35 PM, Bruce Perens wrote:
On 12/04/2013 02:57 PM, Phillip Hallam-Baker wrote:

When someone starts accusing everyone of treason it isn't so much refutation that is appropriate as the men in white coats.
Oh, come on Phillip. I did not accuse anyone, I said that it was arguably criminal or treasonous, and warned of the danger to you.

I work for law firms all day, bridging technology and law. I think
Sorry, incomlete sentence. Should be:

I think that some IETF participants, somewhere, and some browser implementors, somewhere, potentially have a legal problem. I would hate to see you treated the way some security experts have been treated. IMO you ignore that risk at your peril.

    Thanks

    Bruce

v2.23.0 | Report a Bug | By Email