IETF Logo Mail Archive

Re: [perpass] Draft charter for a Transparency Working Group

Ben Laurie <benl@google.com> Wed, 11 December 2013 18:53 UTC

Return-Path: <benl@google.com>
X-Original-To: perpass@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: perpass@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id E805E1AE159 for <perpass@ietfa.amsl.com>; Wed, 11 Dec 2013 10:53:05 -0800 (PST)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -1.38
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-1.38 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_AU=-0.1, FM_FORGED_GMAIL=0.622, RP_MATCHES_RCVD=-0.001, SPF_PASS=-0.001] autolearn=no
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id E6WNbtky-ALO for <perpass@ietfa.amsl.com>; Wed, 11 Dec 2013 10:53:04 -0800 (PST)
Received: from mail-vc0-x234.google.com (mail-vc0-x234.google.com [IPv6:2607:f8b0:400c:c03::234]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id A5F3A1ADF74 for <perpass@ietf.org>; Wed, 11 Dec 2013 10:53:02 -0800 (PST)
Received: by mail-vc0-f180.google.com with SMTP id if17so5819436vcb.25 for <perpass@ietf.org>; Wed, 11 Dec 2013 10:52:57 -0800 (PST)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=google.com; s=20120113; h=mime-version:in-reply-to:references:date:message-id:subject:from:to :cc:content-type; bh=GulL1XNID9Z/onmYIilfZWVDcoTsC7wlDeqmEAr39n8=; b=IcQZGKFMS5jx63rpNl0Br7av9kdt2c+7MZVyReCdVeA3OVxnwp59Osj+FbrY/Lezqo 9RVb4V95dfrPRy5z+nbiBpdaiwt2kMuEJvOY5DPgCULjeRS2SEnQ8Hul1x+dFMxheEyG M0rBPhOsZZjQ+9tIA78NF1FX/yo32sbEPB/sNegJ76PwaZr9ogRmoUhmxWwN17lSbPq5 ioZA3QZJr/BJWbVsr46angHrR5xzuYowvWeWe2sava4lOwMLjhae7jkzBKcRyiD08u5x eY+WOVxbwahjSIlhEhkXy9JfInVOLV1c/GJftt4gnLil9aGFm5UAhi1R5erMpxuYz06e X51Q==
X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20130820; h=x-gm-message-state:mime-version:in-reply-to:references:date :message-id:subject:from:to:cc:content-type; bh=GulL1XNID9Z/onmYIilfZWVDcoTsC7wlDeqmEAr39n8=; b=bK8rgsG/RQWmtlGC+YZ1OaeukEUyLTtaOxySwA9WqA+ESRhIrYXo9rm4VP8cXBOLx2 ADdfaNEA4FxJpgpLHXZ0Lk5Kv0Kj2b5loUR65zoVYadkXEfKh0wStY4H94vrI6NNtmaI 7yjJ4kYlNI3LOwWRzip2hJEWbZUu1a6Ce4k/DrHX5J1OHxAwPBQhqBCuCakUZbvZhVtQ 5H6uY8uNBVtBTgDdAueZmRABldiVRBuF1+YqWR/2ZuDit5/yP0fBe6MigXo2+p9VQBWM H9pbbrgIsJZAFeQ1L3e5Jd7f9myGEgdSA1W4cXktdv1VNhKSCtSZWOKR4GGPpgfZ3O/d 8jXw==
X-Gm-Message-State: ALoCoQkD5kymCvnJFrBC/x1BLAM/j3DQ10cGmXqXBsDd2jyrVr0o3cHRWk5i2ffpc4gZJz7FposMhssq/vtg1Z0Dqly2Rm5z8GGalGpSsH9NDT3qL++BqdQ7t0FkuiBVjk2wVpEJHTMmvqGx2ssmk/pfg9LBV0aeepWjg8/Nhrr38Ktmead7mWDYQvBOnEKeQpIyvRFbvSO+
MIME-Version: 1.0
X-Received: by 10.52.232.135 with SMTP id to7mr633102vdc.58.1386787976907; Wed, 11 Dec 2013 10:52:56 -0800 (PST)
Received: by 10.52.183.65 with HTTP; Wed, 11 Dec 2013 10:52:56 -0800 (PST)
In-Reply-To: <52A8B1D0.2080304@dcrocker.net>
References: <CABrd9STYF166vXEXNneJfPyfo5VG3LPKmzyZpAhvYnDTsy_U9g@mail.gmail.com> <52A8B1D0.2080304@dcrocker.net>
Date: Wed, 11 Dec 2013 18:52:56 +0000
Message-ID: <CABrd9SS9FGsm-waznAHeMr33XzprhRF=DXVjknyL-7bOyArAxg@mail.gmail.com>
From: Ben Laurie <benl@google.com>
To: Dave Crocker <dcrocker@bbiw.net>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="ISO-8859-1"
Cc: perpass <perpass@ietf.org>, "saag@ietf.org" <saag@ietf.org>
Subject: Re: [perpass] Draft charter for a Transparency Working Group
X-BeenThere: perpass@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.15
Precedence: list
List-Id: "The perpass list is for IETF discussion of pervasive monitoring. " <perpass.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/perpass>, <mailto:perpass-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://www.ietf.org/mail-archive/web/perpass/>
List-Post: <mailto:perpass@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:perpass-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/perpass>, <mailto:perpass-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 11 Dec 2013 18:53:06 -0000

On 11 December 2013 18:41, Dave Crocker <dhc@dcrocker.net> wrote:
> On 12/11/2013 10:32 AM, Ben Laurie wrote:
>>
>> http://www.ietf.org/mail-archive/web/therightkey/current/msg00680.html
>
>
>
> The text isn't a draft charter.  It's a very generic statement of an idea.
> Formulating that into the detail an actual charter will be helpful.
>
> The text needs to give some explanation of what is being proposed, beyond a
> highly cryptic label like "Cryptographically verifiable logs".  A term like
> that could mean many things and from the message, I can't tell what is
> meant.
>
> The text needs to explain what sort of usage scenario is expected, with
> enough detail to make the scenario substantive.  That permits the reader to
> get a sense of basic/likely relevance to operational environments.

Am I allowed to refer to RFC 6962 for background?

Reiterating what's in there doesn't seem useful.

v2.31.3 | Report a Bug | By Email | System Status