IETF Logo Mail Archive

Re: [perpass] perens-perpass-appropriate-response-01

Bruce Perens <bruce@perens.com> Fri, 06 December 2013 18:53 UTC

Return-Path: <bruce@perens.com>
X-Original-To: perpass@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: perpass@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 944391ADF6E for <perpass@ietfa.amsl.com>; Fri, 6 Dec 2013 10:53:14 -0800 (PST)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -1.177
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-1.177 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, HTML_MESSAGE=0.001, MIME_HTML_ONLY=0.723, RP_MATCHES_RCVD=-0.001] autolearn=no
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id zeDGcyerJ33H for <perpass@ietfa.amsl.com>; Fri, 6 Dec 2013 10:53:14 -0800 (PST)
Received: from alchemy.perens.com (alchemy.perens.com [206.221.219.26]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id E7A0A1ADF8A for <perpass@ietf.org>; Fri, 6 Dec 2013 10:53:13 -0800 (PST)
Received: from [192.168.10.146] (c-50-168-114-183.hsd1.ca.comcast.net [50.168.114.183]) by alchemy.perens.com (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id EB32450008A for <perpass@ietf.org>; Fri, 6 Dec 2013 10:53:09 -0800 (PST)
Message-ID: <52A21D1C.8020000@perens.com>
Date: Fri, 06 Dec 2013 10:53:16 -0800
From: Bruce Perens <bruce@perens.com>
User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; Linux x86_64; rv:17.0) Gecko/20131103 Icedove/17.0.10
MIME-Version: 1.0
To: perpass@ietf.org
References: <E2DA1477-C86E-441E-A33D-D47A0D67AFF3@iab.org> <EF9BD1E4-6EF3-4035-AC4E-1A2D3CADE615@mnot.net> <529E8494.7000806@perens.com> <20131204111309.GB11727@nic.fr> <529F61D8.6030105@perens.com> <20131204171207.GC19914@thunk.org> <529F63C0.3040804@perens.com> <529F88AC.3090904@appelbaum.net> <529F90A0.8000706@perens.com> <529F9205.30906@appelbaum.net> <529F98C0.9090808@perens.com> <529F9F14.8050805@appelbaum.net> <529FB61A.7090604@perens.com> <529FBEF9.7030205@appelbaum.net> <529FC347.3080806@perens.com> <52A15835.2070901@cis-india.org> <52A21B80.8070005@mykolab.com>
In-Reply-To: <52A21B80.8070005@mykolab.com>
Content-Type: text/html; charset="ISO-8859-1"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Subject: Re: [perpass] perens-perpass-appropriate-response-01
X-BeenThere: perpass@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.15
Precedence: list
List-Id: "The perpass list is for IETF discussion of pervasive monitoring. " <perpass.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/perpass>, <mailto:perpass-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://www.ietf.org/mail-archive/web/perpass/>
List-Post: <mailto:perpass@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:perpass-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/perpass>, <mailto:perpass-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Fri, 06 Dec 2013 18:53:14 -0000



> You can opt out of the Concealment Society if you want to.  But please
> don't force me to stay within the Surveillance Society.
This will be just fine if it's true. How do I opt out of the Concealment Society if browsers and servers implement HTTP 2.0 as proposed, eventually dropping support for HTTP 1, and neither the browser or server have an in-the-clear mode?

That's really all this discussion is about. Not any advisory to run https preferentially, but the fact that http isn't being left in the standard.

    Thanks

    Bruce

v2.23.0 | Report a Bug | By Email