Re: [perpass] privacy/PM reviews of existing stuff

Stephen Farrell <stephen.farrell@cs.tcd.ie> Sat, 01 February 2014 17:15 UTC

Return-Path: <stephen.farrell@cs.tcd.ie>
X-Original-To: perpass@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: perpass@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 72C041A05B5 for <perpass@ietfa.amsl.com>; Sat, 1 Feb 2014 09:15:25 -0800 (PST)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -2.435
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-2.435 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, RP_MATCHES_RCVD=-0.535] autolearn=ham
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id FasYGVW8_DKj for <perpass@ietfa.amsl.com>; Sat, 1 Feb 2014 09:15:23 -0800 (PST)
Received: from mercury.scss.tcd.ie (mercury.scss.tcd.ie [134.226.56.6]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 18B231A05A6 for <perpass@ietf.org>; Sat, 1 Feb 2014 09:15:23 -0800 (PST)
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by mercury.scss.tcd.ie (Postfix) with ESMTP id 7A810BE4D; Sat, 1 Feb 2014 17:15:18 +0000 (GMT)
X-Virus-Scanned: Debian amavisd-new at scss.tcd.ie
Received: from mercury.scss.tcd.ie ([127.0.0.1]) by localhost (mercury.scss.tcd.ie [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id b2jLm9NfxYYN; Sat, 1 Feb 2014 17:15:17 +0000 (GMT)
Received: from [10.87.48.10] (unknown [86.46.30.212]) by mercury.scss.tcd.ie (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id 0653CBE38; Sat, 1 Feb 2014 17:15:17 +0000 (GMT)
Message-ID: <52ED2BA4.1040003@cs.tcd.ie>
Date: Sat, 01 Feb 2014 17:15:16 +0000
From: Stephen Farrell <stephen.farrell@cs.tcd.ie>
User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; Linux x86_64; rv:24.0) Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/24.2.0
MIME-Version: 1.0
To: Avri Doria <avri@acm.org>, perpass@ietf.org
References: <52E90863.5070805@cs.tcd.ie> <52ED0B83.9020300@acm.org>
In-Reply-To: <52ED0B83.9020300@acm.org>
X-Enigmail-Version: 1.6
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="ISO-8859-1"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Subject: Re: [perpass] privacy/PM reviews of existing stuff
X-BeenThere: perpass@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.15
Precedence: list
List-Id: "The perpass list is for IETF discussion of pervasive monitoring. " <perpass.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/perpass>, <mailto:perpass-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://www.ietf.org/mail-archive/web/perpass/>
List-Post: <mailto:perpass@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:perpass-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/perpass>, <mailto:perpass-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Sat, 01 Feb 2014 17:15:25 -0000

Hiya

On 02/01/2014 02:58 PM, Avri Doria wrote:
> 
> 
> Hi,
> 
> I am willing to be self-organized into a PM worrier's klatch.
> and even to review drafts for PM

But you don't want to be a non-self-organizer? :-)

I'm still looking for one, at least between now and London.
What happens later can be figured out there. I think it'd
help for a more productive meeting if someone has time to
think some about the options for doing these kinds of review
for example.

I've requested a room for Monday lunchtime for this anyway.

There will not be a perfect time for such a session of course,
but that's probably as good/bad as any earlier-week slot.

S.

> 
> I think one of the things the Worriers would need to accumulate over
> time, though I am sure the basic list can be created already from
> draft-farrell-perpass-attack, is a list of clues for practices and such
> that might be something to be worried about.
> 
> avri
> 
> 
> On 29-Jan-14 08:55, Stephen Farrell wrote:
>>
>> Hiya,
>>
>> One idea that came up in Vancouver and that we (meaning at least
>> me:-) haven't had a chance to progress was the idea of trying to
>> get a team of folks together to go do privacy reviews of existing
>> RFCs. Or perhaps slightly differently, reviews that explicitly
>> consider pervasive monitoring, which might be more constrained
>> and a bit easier.
>>
>> I think Christian H. commented at the mic that there is probably
>> a *lot* of low hanging fruit out there, and I suspect he's quite
>> right:-)
>>
>> Now that we're in the run up to the London IETF, if some of you
>> had time to try self-organise that kind of thing that'd be great.
>> Any takers for trying to organise that?
>>
>> Using this list to start with should be fine, if it results in
>> loads of traffic we can spin up a new one, or move over to
>> ietf-privacy@ietf.org.
>>
>> If there are folks willing to take this on and having a
>> side-meeting in London helps, I can get you a room for that.
>>
>> Thanks,
>> S.
>>
>>
>> _______________________________________________
>> perpass mailing list
>> perpass@ietf.org
>> https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/perpass
>>
>>
> _______________________________________________
> perpass mailing list
> perpass@ietf.org
> https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/perpass
>