Re: [perpass] privacy/PM reviews of existing stuff

Stephane Bortzmeyer <bortzmeyer@nic.fr> Fri, 31 January 2014 10:50 UTC

Return-Path: <bortzmeyer@nic.fr>
X-Original-To: perpass@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: perpass@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id DF21F1A0585 for <perpass@ietfa.amsl.com>; Fri, 31 Jan 2014 02:50:57 -0800 (PST)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -2.085
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-2.085 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, HELO_EQ_FR=0.35, RP_MATCHES_RCVD=-0.535] autolearn=ham
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id RtWF0hVc7aBx for <perpass@ietfa.amsl.com>; Fri, 31 Jan 2014 02:50:57 -0800 (PST)
Received: from mx4.nic.fr (mx4.nic.fr [IPv6:2001:67c:2218:2::4:12]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id D4BEF1A057D for <perpass@ietf.org>; Fri, 31 Jan 2014 02:50:56 -0800 (PST)
Received: from mx4.nic.fr (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by mx4.nic.fr (Postfix) with SMTP id 10E0328050F; Fri, 31 Jan 2014 11:50:53 +0100 (CET)
Received: from relay2.nic.fr (relay2.nic.fr [192.134.4.163]) by mx4.nic.fr (Postfix) with ESMTP id EF6CD280527; Fri, 31 Jan 2014 11:50:52 +0100 (CET)
Received: from bortzmeyer.nic.fr (batilda.nic.fr [IPv6:2001:67c:1348:8::7:113]) by relay2.nic.fr (Postfix) with ESMTP id 0FE22B3803B; Fri, 31 Jan 2014 11:50:27 +0100 (CET)
Date: Fri, 31 Jan 2014 11:50:26 +0100
From: Stephane Bortzmeyer <bortzmeyer@nic.fr>
To: Dave Crocker <dcrocker@bbiw.net>
Message-ID: <20140131105026.GB32380@nic.fr>
References: <52E90863.5070805@cs.tcd.ie> <52E9235C.2030601@bbiw.net>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii"
Content-Disposition: inline
In-Reply-To: <52E9235C.2030601@bbiw.net>
X-Operating-System: Debian GNU/Linux 7.3
X-Kernel: Linux 3.2.0-4-686-pae i686
Organization: NIC France
X-URL: http://www.nic.fr/
User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.21 (2010-09-15)
Cc: perpass <perpass@ietf.org>, Stephen Farrell <stephen.farrell@cs.tcd.ie>
Subject: Re: [perpass] privacy/PM reviews of existing stuff
X-BeenThere: perpass@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.15
Precedence: list
List-Id: "The perpass list is for IETF discussion of pervasive monitoring. " <perpass.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/perpass>, <mailto:perpass-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://www.ietf.org/mail-archive/web/perpass/>
List-Post: <mailto:perpass@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:perpass-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/perpass>, <mailto:perpass-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Fri, 31 Jan 2014 10:50:58 -0000

On Wed, Jan 29, 2014 at 07:50:52AM -0800,
 Dave Crocker <dcrocker@bbiw.net> wrote 
 a message of 35 lines which said:

> We don't have a track record of those specific types of reviews and
> I believe we are some distance away from having a shared, usable
> model of what to review for.

We don't start from zero, we have already RFC 6973 and its section 8
is a very good example of privacy/PM analysis of an existing protocol.