[perpass] administrative request
Peter Saint-Andre <stpeter@stpeter.im> Thu, 05 December 2013 00:18 UTC
Return-Path: <stpeter@stpeter.im>
X-Original-To: perpass@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: perpass@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 34F3B1AE195 for <perpass@ietfa.amsl.com>; Wed, 4 Dec 2013 16:18:33 -0800 (PST)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -1.903
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-1.903 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, RP_MATCHES_RCVD=-0.001, SPF_HELO_PASS=-0.001, SPF_PASS=-0.001] autolearn=ham
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id 1Mfn-T-Dvboy for <perpass@ietfa.amsl.com>; Wed, 4 Dec 2013 16:18:31 -0800 (PST)
Received: from stpeter.im (mailhost.stpeter.im [207.210.219.225]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id E66871AE177 for <perpass@ietf.org>; Wed, 4 Dec 2013 16:18:30 -0800 (PST)
Received: from sjc-vpn2-300.cisco.com (unknown [128.107.239.235]) (Authenticated sender: stpeter) by stpeter.im (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id 24B0140332; Wed, 4 Dec 2013 17:18:26 -0700 (MST)
Message-ID: <529FC651.1070909@stpeter.im>
Date: Wed, 04 Dec 2013 17:18:25 -0700
From: Peter Saint-Andre <stpeter@stpeter.im>
User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Macintosh; Intel Mac OS X 10.8; rv:24.0) Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/24.1.1
MIME-Version: 1.0
To: perpass <perpass@ietf.org>
X-Enigmail-Version: 1.6
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="ISO-8859-1"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Subject: [perpass] administrative request
X-BeenThere: perpass@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.15
Precedence: list
List-Id: "The perpass list is for IETF discussion of pervasive monitoring. " <perpass.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/perpass>, <mailto:perpass-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://www.ietf.org/mail-archive/web/perpass/>
List-Post: <mailto:perpass@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:perpass-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/perpass>, <mailto:perpass-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 05 Dec 2013 00:18:33 -0000
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE----- Hash: SHA1 It strikes me that the current discussion, although interesting in its own way, has a low signal-to-noise ratio. Perhaps the list admins could suggest a one-day cooling-off period or some such? Peter - -- Peter Saint-Andre https://stpeter.im/ -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG/MacGPG2 v2.0.19 (Darwin) Comment: GPGTools - http://gpgtools.org Comment: Using GnuPG with Thunderbird - http://www.enigmail.net/ iQIcBAEBAgAGBQJSn8ZQAAoJEOoGpJErxa2p00gQAJ/Q9dXkksddLZyDmYBjV7Vd Tp1fn6ZAxDoY+cym44D6e88UXbK4YhmhgcGlpTr7+NJK+fANT8vmciYlFzoWR2Sn n40aPzKod20OUaMLZTnPCIBsBtUKgMa3nXkuCGd8f2P90apU9DtPhO/rtnxthNcL 8NqgHYloA5g2qFMKzo1etxTFogZrtyY9v6TC7FK3YGnmK9yEY4uMh44C+A9mTWQq n1IbA5w2P7z0RWUu4Ta1mFuM+H9EaJucXydVlXFCSyYBgRRx54fvEAFVpZi0k/yo DpNsWU75sU3zwiRtxxor1RC/sbVDuupKYDf4xQSF7MVlociG2m3T0+EUX9HL++lt ZVxJvbnzB9qQ6CLJuFcXFnhGISXJzjbsJ07pPfzdMR7ralj/ttzsFIQrTPnrEOlt T1iYzyH6oIWyKQvqrN6Q+V/9k6TLQdsjpmxjn6bkKhLpFE8marmrlg9TO+kvIAjC ibBax8aNTDYkybjyRx7eiqAxUaM1X4bKWQHXHCr2JqhtMLpwfbIzFGPNRvb7Yeb7 95DH78Pq9oZdHf7Sqkiup8zCM248CUL9YzQwSJP+O8hGsT64lN/Y63tkvqW7YXgX tX/QBcDuTpO3Q0V1kxoDV5Oq+MTSHDKPC/SgJH6MhX25X9APNfMQwj3agtxmyssO i+eahDY4R3Ldi2Kcp7Gs =fgvC -----END PGP SIGNATURE-----
- Re: [perpass] administrative request Randy Bush
- [perpass] administrative request Peter Saint-Andre