IETF Logo Mail Archive

Re: [perpass] relevant LISP discussion

Nick Thomas <nick@lupine.me.uk> Wed, 21 August 2013 18:31 UTC

Return-Path: <nick@lupine.me.uk>
X-Original-To: perpass@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: perpass@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 9263F1F0EE6 for <perpass@ietfa.amsl.com>; Wed, 21 Aug 2013 11:31:19 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -2.499
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-2.499 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[AWL=0.100, BAYES_00=-2.599]
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([12.22.58.30]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id RalmDB0-H05J for <perpass@ietfa.amsl.com>; Wed, 21 Aug 2013 11:31:18 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from oak.forest.a5775.uk0.bigv.io (lupine.me.uk [IPv6:2001:41c8:51:8:feff:ff:fe01:101]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 8A2461F0EDA for <perpass@ietf.org>; Wed, 21 Aug 2013 11:31:18 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from [213.138.102.178] by oak.forest.a5775.uk0.bigv.io with esmtpsa (TLS1.0:RSA_AES_256_CBC_SHA1:32) (Exim 4.72) (envelope-from <nick@lupine.me.uk>) id 1VCDBb-0002po-D5; Wed, 21 Aug 2013 19:31:15 +0100
Message-ID: <52150774.9050009@lupine.me.uk>
Date: Wed, 21 Aug 2013 19:31:16 +0100
From: Nick Thomas <nick@lupine.me.uk>
User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; Linux x86_64; rv:17.0) Gecko/20130704 Icedove/17.0.7
MIME-Version: 1.0
To: perpass@ietf.org
References: <5214E525.7020702@cs.tcd.ie> <5214F25D.6070707@bbn.com> <521500B4.7040107@lupine.me.uk>
In-Reply-To: <521500B4.7040107@lupine.me.uk>
X-Enigmail-Version: 1.5.2
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Subject: Re: [perpass] relevant LISP discussion
X-BeenThere: perpass@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.12
Precedence: list
List-Id: "The perpass list is for discussion of the privacy properties of IETF protocols and concrete ways in which those could be improved. " <perpass.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/perpass>, <mailto:perpass-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://www.ietf.org/mail-archive/web/perpass>
List-Post: <mailto:perpass@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:perpass-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/perpass>, <mailto:perpass-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 21 Aug 2013 18:31:19 -0000

-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
Hash: SHA256

On 21/08/13 19:02, Nick Thomas wrote:

> Or should I just forget about that, and use the ecdh shared secret
> to encrypt a separate private key... for each packet? On a certain
> timescale?

to encrypt a separate shared secret*, I should say.

/Nick
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: GnuPG v1.4.12 (GNU/Linux)
Comment: Using GnuPG with Icedove - http://www.enigmail.net/

iF4EAREIAAYFAlIVB3QACgkQREz3uGI6tdyOfAD/cHlgMC8car53exjsbpXs8HCJ
0Ew/peur8DLVINMY1oEA+wUcaM/dc6dGBd9DPC/RcZZlvo9QmPyOFqWUc3eoRr8t
=v5dA
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----

v2.23.0 | Report a Bug | By Email