Re: [perpass] Getting started...

Randy Bush <> Sat, 17 August 2013 15:58 UTC

Return-Path: <>
Received: from localhost (localhost []) by (Postfix) with ESMTP id BBA0911E8190 for <>; Sat, 17 Aug 2013 08:58:23 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -2.536
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-2.536 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[AWL=0.063, BAYES_00=-2.599]
Received: from ([]) by localhost ( []) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id puPlPbTZY32O for <>; Sat, 17 Aug 2013 08:58:23 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from ( [IPv6:2001:418:8006::18]) by (Postfix) with ESMTP id 3220F11E818A for <>; Sat, 17 Aug 2013 08:58:23 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from localhost ([] by with esmtp (Exim 4.76) (envelope-from <>) id 1VAitM-0000Zj-EE; Sat, 17 Aug 2013 15:58:16 +0000
Date: Sun, 18 Aug 2013 00:58:14 +0900
Message-ID: <>
From: Randy Bush <>
To: Russ White <>
In-Reply-To: <022e01ce9b5c$3c471130$b4d53390$>
References: <> <> <> <> <> <022e01ce9b5c$3c471130$b4d53390$>
User-Agent: Wanderlust/2.15.9 (Almost Unreal) Emacs/22.3 Mule/5.0 (SAKAKI)
MIME-Version: 1.0 (generated by SEMI 1.14.7 - "Harue")
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="US-ASCII"
Cc:, 'Stephen Farrell' <>
Subject: Re: [perpass] Getting started...
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.12
Precedence: list
List-Id: "The perpass list is for discussion of the privacy properties of IETF protocols and concrete ways in which those could be improved. " <>
List-Unsubscribe: <>, <>
List-Archive: <>
List-Post: <>
List-Help: <>
List-Subscribe: <>, <>
X-List-Received-Date: Sat, 17 Aug 2013 15:58:23 -0000

> Why not focus on providing proxies and the like to obfuscate the
> traffic path rather than trying to encrypt the routing table?

if it's cheap, do both.  every cm we can raise the bar cheaply is a win

>>> i would love it if my email client ( well, normal email clients :-)
>>> automagically encrypted to the recipients for whom i have a public key.
>>> maybe the folk way up there at layer seven can come up with an even
>>> better idea.
> Thunderbird+Enigmail does this.

yep.  trying to move family members and coworkers to that mode.  but, as
i hinted, i use a horribly irregular emacs-based email client.

> I know lots of folks with public keys, but they won't encrypt their
> email traffic, because "I have nothing to hide" --and complete bit of
> nonsense, but very prevelant.

i am hoping the frogs will notice the rising water temperature.  foolish
of me, probably.  but this is one reason why i suggested privacy by