Re: [perpass] mail tracking (was; Re: Getting started...)

Ben Laurie <benl@google.com> Sat, 17 August 2013 17:08 UTC

Return-Path: <benl@google.com>
X-Original-To: perpass@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: perpass@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id D00A211E8229 for <perpass@ietfa.amsl.com>; Sat, 17 Aug 2013 10:08:30 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -1.337
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-1.337 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[AWL=0.640, BAYES_00=-2.599, FM_FORGED_GMAIL=0.622, HTML_MESSAGE=0.001, NO_RELAYS=-0.001]
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([12.22.58.30]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id Ta0F-g53kGDv for <perpass@ietfa.amsl.com>; Sat, 17 Aug 2013 10:08:29 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from mail-qa0-x22b.google.com (mail-qa0-x22b.google.com [IPv6:2607:f8b0:400d:c00::22b]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 1147E11E8227 for <perpass@ietf.org>; Sat, 17 Aug 2013 10:08:24 -0700 (PDT)
Received: by mail-qa0-f43.google.com with SMTP id cl20so1079693qab.9 for <perpass@ietf.org>; Sat, 17 Aug 2013 10:07:59 -0700 (PDT)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=google.com; s=20120113; h=mime-version:in-reply-to:references:date:message-id:subject:from:to :cc:content-type; bh=MGJTMZWP8qVqJxIEtNOFqQZt2qupNLyTAbZlnAe+RNY=; b=PtYnRYfx96Au7TadVkZ73QdzRfd6XiK6b1mZOyXyGQE14SG+0iPdBS/rlBKncJDgNw QLoUjRGTjtEaPIz0Z3sA11xMVpM9BV/hZ23nHzy6IjxNU0crxWLgBYE+WeCGiH/bB6+R zMVQV8sustxJ6UnP5LZeFFdzlPsfMisNFDPRC000nP2EqY7owKzPQAmUfFqQpm6dZRJL k3+zu2PxQ1mTe5TIMyCYX7AmTVJM5rpYBI5QC0DkU9jx+terrlCiDxsVP7zsIse9AxqE 5d0fHhETrD4E8CVlshR7TthfSu0A5x9WoVmYI7KzTW22C7xQN+PFoiO/yIAqG8LhsUVK NJ1Q==
X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=google.com; s=20120113; h=x-gm-message-state:mime-version:in-reply-to:references:date :message-id:subject:from:to:cc:content-type; bh=MGJTMZWP8qVqJxIEtNOFqQZt2qupNLyTAbZlnAe+RNY=; b=FEJtCW+hdanwWjBu7VbrP+qSnWswl78yijj/frlF0S06YcEltQmfZ6B/5aax1o/zbb f05xgzZjiy3F9iks6lDEKDGuEhlVeQpyfVlF7O2ydUF23N+2dNVzPtjU6IZQBkDLQUGA vdSjDaM1QK5obJcXhUk+iWypl7uYy0TVcB2ISZRPVt+hqb/MMc0CsKxBMYl1Kkljb5g0 +8uH4S05Kfwhm2PxREZJXQLLeE560cfYQewAGWF/niOjCjyQWu0KrW3qO4T3zo7qcR18 DWDE6OqEKrZ8NjvW/JhiYwCDUUcchmWRx4XJjJQaD93cTU9QPE6pV4qpYmEJyzhr/oE6 UNlw==
X-Gm-Message-State: ALoCoQmJUzpPzPQJR53kNHmh8R06R09z4u2iJCjXQ8Lg3lNRQ0i5YpC+lHNMeZp2Lk59DN7IvytYW57YxyOmrxrXMKpjQIV2P/RppnfCZhPLjQedV4N7vXaBAMvIGksAduXVWh58Z1bvO81xsC/miG3WSkNPPTrOxSfnX58GTslnSvs1iTKHZO+Fa9kv/ZiZ/EIx3tFmyMek
MIME-Version: 1.0
X-Received: by 10.49.15.97 with SMTP id w1mr4327567qec.13.1376759278901; Sat, 17 Aug 2013 10:07:58 -0700 (PDT)
Received: by 10.229.169.196 with HTTP; Sat, 17 Aug 2013 10:07:58 -0700 (PDT)
In-Reply-To: <m2li40dzip.wl%randy@psg.com>
References: <520E5684.1090005@cs.tcd.ie> <CABrd9SS6txRujNLbLqscKncK+Q=9YLPzX_3-sNuLP56VFMBLiw@mail.gmail.com> <520F6405.6010102@cs.tcd.ie> <CABrd9SR-+ypxEOwrOgQEyUK6FcguoKmg_P++xKm5tWvUAsTV2w@mail.gmail.com> <520F933E.4070309@cs.tcd.ie> <m2li40dzip.wl%randy@psg.com>
Date: Sat, 17 Aug 2013 13:07:58 -0400
Message-ID: <CABrd9STYsD3TEPdCoZ=5V=ZoysVDA=B6+j26_qA-2cOu1uiSqQ@mail.gmail.com>
From: Ben Laurie <benl@google.com>
To: Randy Bush <randy@psg.com>
Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary=047d7bb042e2c2bd5d04e427bff0
Cc: perpass@ietf.org, Stephen Farrell <stephen.farrell@cs.tcd.ie>
Subject: Re: [perpass] mail tracking (was; Re: Getting started...)
X-BeenThere: perpass@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.12
Precedence: list
List-Id: "The perpass list is for discussion of the privacy properties of IETF protocols and concrete ways in which those could be improved. " <perpass.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/perpass>, <mailto:perpass-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://www.ietf.org/mail-archive/web/perpass>
List-Post: <mailto:perpass@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:perpass-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/perpass>, <mailto:perpass-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Sat, 17 Aug 2013 17:08:31 -0000

On 17 August 2013 12:59, Randy Bush <randy@psg.com> wrote:

> > I wondered about that. Anyone know how big the MIT PGP key server
> > DB is for example?
> >
> > I'd say storing it locally would be fine
>
> and doing what?  trusting it?  puhleeze!
>

This is precisely why you want a _verifiable_ map. So you don't have to
trust it.


>
> randy
>