IETF Logo Mail Archive

Re: [Pesci-discuss] Hoping Pesci is still flopping around...

Pekka Savola <pekkas@netcore.fi> Mon, 09 January 2006 15:43 UTC

Received: from localhost.cnri.reston.va.us ([127.0.0.1] helo=megatron.ietf.org) by megatron.ietf.org with esmtp (Exim 4.32) id 1EvzAz-0000Ky-DL; Mon, 09 Jan 2006 10:43:17 -0500
Received: from odin.ietf.org ([132.151.1.176] helo=ietf.org) by megatron.ietf.org with esmtp (Exim 4.32) id 1EvzAx-0000Ko-Il for pesci-discuss@megatron.ietf.org; Mon, 09 Jan 2006 10:43:15 -0500
Received: from ietf-mx.ietf.org (ietf-mx [132.151.6.1]) by ietf.org (8.9.1a/8.9.1a) with ESMTP id KAA22884 for <pesci-discuss@ietf.org>; Mon, 9 Jan 2006 10:41:57 -0500 (EST)
Received: from netcore.fi ([193.94.160.1]) by ietf-mx.ietf.org with esmtp (Exim 4.43) id 1EvzHS-00006X-Ll for pesci-discuss@ietf.org; Mon, 09 Jan 2006 10:50:00 -0500
Received: from netcore.fi (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by netcore.fi (8.12.8/8.12.8) with ESMTP id k09FgtYG006462; Mon, 9 Jan 2006 17:42:55 +0200
Received: from localhost (pekkas@localhost) by netcore.fi (8.12.8/8.12.8/Submit) with ESMTP id k09FgsC5006459; Mon, 9 Jan 2006 17:42:55 +0200
Date: Mon, 09 Jan 2006 17:42:54 +0200
From: Pekka Savola <pekkas@netcore.fi>
To: Brian E Carpenter <brc@zurich.ibm.com>
Subject: Re: [Pesci-discuss] Hoping Pesci is still flopping around...
In-Reply-To: <43C264E0.10101@zurich.ibm.com>
Message-ID: <Pine.LNX.4.64.0601091740120.6192@netcore.fi>
References: <099201c6113c$6aaf4860$0500a8c0@china.huawei.com> <43C264E0.10101@zurich.ibm.com>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: TEXT/PLAIN; charset="US-ASCII"; format="flowed"
X-Virus-Scanned: ClamAV version 0.87.1, clamav-milter version 0.87 on otso.netcore.fi
X-Virus-Status: Clean
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-0.7 required=5.0 tests=ALL_TRUSTED,AWL autolearn=ham version=3.1.0
X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.1.0 (2005-09-13) on otso.netcore.fi
X-Spam-Score: 0.0 (/)
X-Scan-Signature: 1ac7cc0a4cd376402b85bc1961a86ac2
Cc: PESCI Discuss Mailing List <pesci-discuss@ietf.org>
X-BeenThere: pesci-discuss@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5
Precedence: list
List-Id: Process Evolution Study Committee of the IETF discussion <pesci-discuss.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www1.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/pesci-discuss>, <mailto:pesci-discuss-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://www1.ietf.org/pipermail/pesci-discuss>
List-Post: <mailto:pesci-discuss@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:pesci-discuss-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www1.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/pesci-discuss>, <mailto:pesci-discuss-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
Sender: pesci-discuss-bounces@ietf.org
Errors-To: pesci-discuss-bounces@ietf.org

On Mon, 9 Jan 2006, Brian E Carpenter wrote:
> Should I do something with draft-carpenter-procdoc-roadmap?
...
> If it did become an agreed guide to process documents, it could
> well be used as a web site reference.

Maybe it could go live somewhere on the IETF web pages, in the same 
manner the IESG has published some other, possibly changing documents 
(e.g., http://www.ietf.org/ID-Checklist.html) ?

-- 
Pekka Savola                 "You each name yourselves king, yet the
Netcore Oy                    kingdom bleeds."
Systems. Networks. Security. -- George R.R. Martin: A Clash of Kings

_______________________________________________
Pesci-discuss mailing list
Pesci-discuss@ietf.org
https://www1.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/pesci-discuss

v2.23.0 | Report a Bug | By Email