Re: [Pesci-discuss] [Fwd: I-D ACTION:draft-davies-pesci-initial-considerations-01.txt]

Elwyn Davies <elwynd@dial.pipex.com> Mon, 16 January 2006 14:10 UTC

Received: from localhost.cnri.reston.va.us ([127.0.0.1] helo=megatron.ietf.org) by megatron.ietf.org with esmtp (Exim 4.32) id 1EyV4F-00089Y-V0; Mon, 16 Jan 2006 09:10:43 -0500
Received: from odin.ietf.org ([132.151.1.176] helo=ietf.org) by megatron.ietf.org with esmtp (Exim 4.32) id 1EyV4E-00088r-5h for pesci-discuss@megatron.ietf.org; Mon, 16 Jan 2006 09:10:42 -0500
Received: from ietf-mx.ietf.org (ietf-mx [132.151.6.1]) by ietf.org (8.9.1a/8.9.1a) with ESMTP id JAA15500 for <pesci-discuss@ietf.org>; Mon, 16 Jan 2006 09:09:16 -0500 (EST)
Received: from b.painless.aaisp.net.uk ([81.187.81.52] helo=smtp.aaisp.net.uk) by ietf-mx.ietf.org with esmtp (Exim 4.43) id 1EyVC7-0002dX-8r for pesci-discuss@ietf.org; Mon, 16 Jan 2006 09:18:54 -0500
Received: from 247.254.187.81.in-addr.arpa ([81.187.254.247] helo=[127.0.0.1]) by smtp.aaisp.net.uk with esmtps (TLSv1:AES256-SHA:256) (Exim 4.43) id 1EyV3t-0006ix-7H; Mon, 16 Jan 2006 14:10:21 +0000
Message-ID: <43CBA9CC.6040601@dial.pipex.com>
Date: Mon, 16 Jan 2006 14:12:28 +0000
From: Elwyn Davies <elwynd@dial.pipex.com>
User-Agent: Mozilla Thunderbird 1.0.7 (Windows/20050923)
X-Accept-Language: en-us, en
MIME-Version: 1.0
To: Pekka Savola <pekkas@netcore.fi>
Subject: Re: [Pesci-discuss] [Fwd: I-D ACTION:draft-davies-pesci-initial-considerations-01.txt]
References: <43C92D1B.8040103@zurich.ibm.com> <Pine.LNX.4.64.0601161542050.5861@netcore.fi>
In-Reply-To: <Pine.LNX.4.64.0601161542050.5861@netcore.fi>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="ISO-8859-1"; format="flowed"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
X-Spam-Score: 0.0 (/)
X-Scan-Signature: bb8f917bb6b8da28fc948aeffb74aa17
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Cc: pesci-discuss@ietf.org
X-BeenThere: pesci-discuss@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5
Precedence: list
List-Id: Process Evolution Study Committee of the IETF discussion <pesci-discuss.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www1.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/pesci-discuss>, <mailto:pesci-discuss-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://www1.ietf.org/pipermail/pesci-discuss>
List-Post: <mailto:pesci-discuss@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:pesci-discuss-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www1.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/pesci-discuss>, <mailto:pesci-discuss-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
Sender: pesci-discuss-bounces@ietf.org
Errors-To: pesci-discuss-bounces@ietf.org


Pekka Savola wrote:

> On Sat, 14 Jan 2006, Brian E Carpenter wrote:
>
>>     Title        : Moving Forwards with IETF Process Evolution
>>     Author(s)    : E. Davies
>>     Filename    : draft-davies-pesci-initial-considerations-01.txt
>>     Pages        : 15
>>     Date        : 2006-1-13
>> ...
>> http://www.ietf.org/internet-drafts/draft-davies-pesci-initial-considerations-01.txt 
>>
>
>
>
> As my own major comments,
>
> 1) I still can't believe P6 wasn't removed already.  The bar for 
> making process change proposals is too high already -- why should we 
> need to add, "oh by the way, please redesign our current process 
> documents while you're at it.. THANKS!".  This doesn't seem productive.
>
>    P6. The revised process should be documented in a new set of coherent
>        and comprehensive documents, rather than updates to the existing
>        ad hoc set.
>
>
Apologies; That is a dropoff.  P6 was *supposed* to have vanished.  I 
think that actually this a part of the problems and you will find that 
there is a new item 10 in the problems.

Regards,
Elwyn

_______________________________________________
Pesci-discuss mailing list
Pesci-discuss@ietf.org
https://www1.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/pesci-discuss