IETF Logo Mail Archive

Re: [Pesci-discuss] For whom it may concern..

"JFC (Jefsey) Morfin" <jefsey@jefsey.com> Thu, 10 November 2005 13:33 UTC

Received: from localhost.cnri.reston.va.us ([127.0.0.1] helo=megatron.ietf.org) by megatron.ietf.org with esmtp (Exim 4.32) id 1EaCYn-0002Y9-Um; Thu, 10 Nov 2005 08:33:49 -0500
Received: from odin.ietf.org ([132.151.1.176] helo=ietf.org) by megatron.ietf.org with esmtp (Exim 4.32) id 1EaCYm-0002XV-2c for pesci-discuss@megatron.ietf.org; Thu, 10 Nov 2005 08:33:48 -0500
Received: from ietf-mx.ietf.org (ietf-mx [132.151.6.1]) by ietf.org (8.9.1a/8.9.1a) with ESMTP id IAA02908 for <pesci-discuss@ietf.org>; Thu, 10 Nov 2005 08:33:19 -0500 (EST)
Received: from montage.altserver.com ([63.247.74.122]) by ietf-mx.ietf.org with esmtp (Exim 4.43) id 1EaCoy-0001zF-AB for pesci-discuss@ietf.org; Thu, 10 Nov 2005 08:50:33 -0500
Received: from ver78-2-82-241-91-24.fbx.proxad.net ([82.241.91.24] helo=jfc.afrac.org) by montage.altserver.com with esmtpa (Exim 4.44) id 1EaCYa-0001vH-3A; Thu, 10 Nov 2005 05:33:37 -0800
Message-Id: <6.2.3.4.2.20051110134955.05bd9eb0@mail.jefsey.com>
X-Mailer: QUALCOMM Windows Eudora Version 6.2.3.4
Date: Thu, 10 Nov 2005 13:54:47 +0100
To: Pekka Savola <pekkas@netcore.fi>, Leslie Daigle <leslie@thinkingcat.com>
From: "JFC (Jefsey) Morfin" <jefsey@jefsey.com>
Subject: Re: [Pesci-discuss] For whom it may concern..
In-Reply-To: <Pine.LNX.4.64.0511100757470.13106@netcore.fi>
References: <Pine.LNX.4.64.0511100249360.7319@netcore.fi> <43729E65.30506@thinkingcat.com> <Pine.LNX.4.64.0511100757470.13106@netcore.fi>
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii"; format=flowed
X-AntiAbuse: This header was added to track abuse, please include it with any abuse report
X-AntiAbuse: Primary Hostname - montage.altserver.com
X-AntiAbuse: Original Domain - ietf.org
X-AntiAbuse: Originator/Caller UID/GID - [47 12] / [47 12]
X-AntiAbuse: Sender Address Domain - jefsey.com
X-Spam-Score: 0.0 (/)
X-Scan-Signature: cf4fa59384e76e63313391b70cd0dd25
Cc: pesci-discuss@ietf.org
X-BeenThere: pesci-discuss@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5
Precedence: list
List-Id: Process Evolution Study Committee of the IETF discussion <pesci-discuss.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www1.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/pesci-discuss>, <mailto:pesci-discuss-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://www1.ietf.org/pipermail/pesci-discuss>
List-Post: <mailto:pesci-discuss@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:pesci-discuss-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www1.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/pesci-discuss>, <mailto:pesci-discuss-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
Sender: pesci-discuss-bounces@ietf.org
Errors-To: pesci-discuss-bounces@ietf.org

At 07:28 10/11/2005, Pekka Savola wrote:
>  It just doesn't seem to be possible to devote sufficient energy to 
> do these things, while keeping the "daily business" running.

As a user implied IETF outsider (meaning having a direct 
understanding but being mentally unbound), I think this is not 
possible. You cannot mentally carry well a job one way and think it 
should be done better otherwise. You can advise, not organise.

This should be nr 1 rule of any change process. Until a change is 
enforced, the previous practice must be 100% enforced. Otherwise 
transitions become confusion.
jfc




_______________________________________________
Pesci-discuss mailing list
Pesci-discuss@ietf.org
https://www1.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/pesci-discuss

v2.8.7 | Report a Bug | By Email