Re: [Pesci-discuss] Face-to-face meetings

Scott W Brim <swb@employees.org> Fri, 21 October 2005 13:34 UTC

Received: from localhost.localdomain ([127.0.0.1] helo=megatron.ietf.org) by megatron.ietf.org with esmtp (Exim 4.32) id 1ESx26-0005M8-78; Fri, 21 Oct 2005 09:34:06 -0400
Received: from odin.ietf.org ([132.151.1.176] helo=ietf.org) by megatron.ietf.org with esmtp (Exim 4.32) id 1ESx24-0005Lu-TP for pesci-discuss@megatron.ietf.org; Fri, 21 Oct 2005 09:34:05 -0400
Received: from ietf-mx.ietf.org (ietf-mx [132.151.6.1]) by ietf.org (8.9.1a/8.9.1a) with ESMTP id JAA21651 for <pesci-discuss@ietf.org>; Fri, 21 Oct 2005 09:33:53 -0400 (EDT)
Received: from rtp-iport-2.cisco.com ([64.102.122.149]) by ietf-mx.ietf.org with esmtp (Exim 4.43) id 1ESxEC-000135-TL for pesci-discuss@ietf.org; Fri, 21 Oct 2005 09:46:38 -0400
Received: from rtp-core-2.cisco.com ([64.102.124.13]) by rtp-iport-2.cisco.com with ESMTP; 21 Oct 2005 09:33:55 -0400
X-IronPort-AV: i="3.97,239,1125892800"; d="scan'208"; a="74160007:sNHT24040032"
Received: from xbh-rtp-201.amer.cisco.com (xbh-rtp-201.cisco.com [64.102.31.12]) by rtp-core-2.cisco.com (8.12.10/8.12.6) with ESMTP id j9LDXfEq017854; Fri, 21 Oct 2005 09:33:51 -0400 (EDT)
Received: from xfe-rtp-201.amer.cisco.com ([64.102.31.38]) by xbh-rtp-201.amer.cisco.com with Microsoft SMTPSVC(6.0.3790.211); Fri, 21 Oct 2005 09:33:49 -0400
Received: from cisco.com ([10.86.242.124]) by xfe-rtp-201.amer.cisco.com with Microsoft SMTPSVC(6.0.3790.211); Fri, 21 Oct 2005 09:33:49 -0400
Date: Fri, 21 Oct 2005 09:33:32 -0400
From: Scott W Brim <swb@employees.org>
To: Brian E Carpenter <brc@zurich.ibm.com>
Subject: Re: [Pesci-discuss] Face-to-face meetings
Message-ID: <20051021133332.GD1600@sbrim-wxp01>
References: <0BDFFF51DC89434FA33F8B37FCE363D502882EEB@zcarhxm2.corp.nortel.com> <43577097.7040503@zurich.ibm.com> <017d01c5d5a5$0a9e8c10$f5087c0a@china.huawei.com> <6.2.0.14.2.20051021082310.02be4958@kahuna.telstra.net> <20051020224356.GA5984@sbrim-wxp01> <43589BF0.20707@piuha.net> <C42099E28B30B2D24B739513@svartdal.hjemme.alvestrand.no> <4358BC86.7050007@zurich.ibm.com>
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
Content-Disposition: inline
In-Reply-To: <4358BC86.7050007@zurich.ibm.com>
User-Agent: Mutt/1.4.2.1i
X-OriginalArrivalTime: 21 Oct 2005 13:33:49.0502 (UTC) FILETIME=[11D1F5E0:01C5D644]
X-Spam-Score: 0.0 (/)
X-Scan-Signature: 7aefe408d50e9c7c47615841cb314bed
Cc: PESCI Discuss Mailing List <pesci-discuss@ietf.org>
X-BeenThere: pesci-discuss@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5
Precedence: list
List-Id: Process Evolution Study Committee of the IETF discussion <pesci-discuss.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www1.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/pesci-discuss>, <mailto:pesci-discuss-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://www1.ietf.org/pipermail/pesci-discuss>
List-Post: <mailto:pesci-discuss@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:pesci-discuss-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www1.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/pesci-discuss>, <mailto:pesci-discuss-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
Sender: pesci-discuss-bounces@ietf.org
Errors-To: pesci-discuss-bounces@ietf.org

On Fri, Oct 21, 2005 12:01:42PM +0200, Brian E Carpenter allegedly wrote:
> So, I read this as saying no change of principle here,
> which would mean out of scope for PESCI.

Scope?  If this conclusion (about how to conduct our work) has
significant impact on how processes could be changed, then it should
be noted, no?

_______________________________________________
Pesci-discuss mailing list
Pesci-discuss@ietf.org
https://www1.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/pesci-discuss