Re: [Pesci-discuss] "ADs are the central focus of technical expertise"

"JFC (Jefsey) Morfin" <jefsey@jefsey.com> Sun, 23 October 2005 15:51 UTC

Received: from localhost.localdomain ([127.0.0.1] helo=megatron.ietf.org) by megatron.ietf.org with esmtp (Exim 4.32) id 1ETi8O-0007vs-5m; Sun, 23 Oct 2005 11:51:44 -0400
Received: from odin.ietf.org ([132.151.1.176] helo=ietf.org) by megatron.ietf.org with esmtp (Exim 4.32) id 1ETi8L-0007vX-4y for pesci-discuss@megatron.ietf.org; Sun, 23 Oct 2005 11:51:43 -0400
Received: from ietf-mx.ietf.org (ietf-mx [132.151.6.1]) by ietf.org (8.9.1a/8.9.1a) with ESMTP id LAA11974 for <pesci-discuss@ietf.org>; Sun, 23 Oct 2005 11:51:28 -0400 (EDT)
Received: from montage.altserver.com ([63.247.74.122]) by ietf-mx.ietf.org with esmtp (Exim 4.43) id 1ETiKt-000691-4Q for pesci-discuss@ietf.org; Sun, 23 Oct 2005 12:04:41 -0400
Received: from ver78-2-82-241-91-24.fbx.proxad.net ([82.241.91.24] helo=jfc.afrac.org) by montage.altserver.com with esmtpa (Exim 4.44) id 1ETi88-0007OG-V9; Sun, 23 Oct 2005 08:51:29 -0700
Message-Id: <6.2.3.4.2.20051023163401.03dc5140@mail.jefsey.com>
X-Mailer: QUALCOMM Windows Eudora Version 6.2.3.4
Date: Sun, 23 Oct 2005 16:34:15 +0200
To: Elwyn Davies <elwynd@dial.pipex.com>, Brian E Carpenter <brc@zurich.ibm.com>
From: "JFC (Jefsey) Morfin" <jefsey@jefsey.com>
Subject: Re: [Pesci-discuss] "ADs are the central focus of technical expertise"
In-Reply-To: <435B8160.8090501@dial.pipex.com>
References: <43535DFB.2040909@zurich.ibm.com> <0bca01c5d4e0$e3341010$0500a8c0@china.huawei.com> <4358BBF8.1050108@zurich.ibm.com> <045901c5d649$8949f7d0$f5087c0a@china.huawei.com> <20051021144856.GC1428@sbrim-wxp01> <435B58A2.1060602@zurich.ibm.com> <435B8160.8090501@dial.pipex.com>
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="iso-8859-1"; format=flowed
X-AntiAbuse: This header was added to track abuse, please include it with any abuse report
X-AntiAbuse: Primary Hostname - montage.altserver.com
X-AntiAbuse: Original Domain - ietf.org
X-AntiAbuse: Originator/Caller UID/GID - [47 12] / [47 12]
X-AntiAbuse: Sender Address Domain - jefsey.com
X-Spam-Score: 0.0 (/)
X-Scan-Signature: d185fa790257f526fedfd5d01ed9c976
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
X-MIME-Autoconverted: from 8bit to quoted-printable by ietf.org id LAA11974
Cc: pesci-discuss@ietf.org
X-BeenThere: pesci-discuss@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5
Precedence: list
List-Id: Process Evolution Study Committee of the IETF discussion <pesci-discuss.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www1.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/pesci-discuss>, <mailto:pesci-discuss-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://www1.ietf.org/pipermail/pesci-discuss>
List-Post: <mailto:pesci-discuss@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:pesci-discuss-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www1.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/pesci-discuss>, <mailto:pesci-discuss-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
Sender: pesci-discuss-bounces@ietf.org
Errors-To: pesci-discuss-bounces@ietf.org

Interesting en-latn-uk-x-ietf debate.
I would love the AD to be considered as the users interests steward.
jfc


At 14:26 23/10/2005, Elwyn Davies wrote:
>Brian E Carpenter wrote:
>
>>Scott W Brim wrote:
>>
>>>On Fri, Oct 21, 2005 09:12:51AM -0500, Spencer Dawkins allegedly wrote:
>>>
>>>>I'm quite a bit more comfortable with "central arbitrators of 
>>>>technical expertise", and think the statement is probably even true - others?
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>>Can you find a phrase that sounds a little more natural and less like
>>>George Will?
>>
>>
>>I don't know who George Will is
>
>Neither did I, but I happened to come across a reference to him 
>yesterday. For the benefit of the uninformed in the rest of the 
>world he is apparently a venerable (since 1977!), conservative 
>opinion columnist for the Washington Post and television talking 
>head. I presume he has some of the same predilictions for flowery 
>language to which I am prone. Maybe also the same urge to ensure 
>that some of the more precise words in the half million or so that 
>English provides us with do not fall into abeyance.
>
>>but I agree the phrase is a bit
>>clumsy - if we agree on the notion, we can surely find a better word.
>
>The word you are probably after is 'arbiter', rather than 'arbitrator'.
>
> From the OED:
>
>
>    arbiter
>
>• *noun* *1* a person who settles a dispute. *2* a person who has 
>influence over something.
>
>— ORIGIN Latin, 'judge, supreme ruler'.
>
>Both senses and the origin seems quite appropriate ;-)
>
>Regards,
>Elwyn
>
>
>>
>>Brian
>>
>>>
>>>
>>>>>2. I believe a more accurate statement is the the ADs are the central
>>>>>arbitrators of technical expertise. They get to appoint WG chairs,
>>>>>expert reviewers, and the like. That's at least as important as their
>>>>>own technical skills, imho.
>>>
>>>
>>>_______________________________________________
>>>Pesci-discuss mailing list
>>>Pesci-discuss@ietf.org
>>>https://www1.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/pesci-discuss
>>
>>
>>_______________________________________________
>>Pesci-discuss mailing list
>>Pesci-discuss@ietf.org
>>https://www1.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/pesci-discuss
>
>
>_______________________________________________
>Pesci-discuss mailing list
>Pesci-discuss@ietf.org
>https://www1.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/pesci-discuss


_______________________________________________
Pesci-discuss mailing list
Pesci-discuss@ietf.org
https://www1.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/pesci-discuss