IETF Logo Mail Archive

Re: Plenary [Re: [Pesci-discuss] Growing concerns about PESCI]

Sam Hartman <hartmans-ietf@mit.edu> Fri, 28 October 2005 15:56 UTC

Received: from localhost.localdomain ([127.0.0.1] helo=megatron.ietf.org) by megatron.ietf.org with esmtp (Exim 4.32) id 1EVWaL-0004Ox-2J; Fri, 28 Oct 2005 11:56:05 -0400
Received: from odin.ietf.org ([132.151.1.176] helo=ietf.org) by megatron.ietf.org with esmtp (Exim 4.32) id 1EVWaK-0004Or-Cp for pesci-discuss@megatron.ietf.org; Fri, 28 Oct 2005 11:56:04 -0400
Received: from ietf-mx.ietf.org (ietf-mx [132.151.6.1]) by ietf.org (8.9.1a/8.9.1a) with ESMTP id LAA25918 for <pesci-discuss@ietf.org>; Fri, 28 Oct 2005 11:55:47 -0400 (EDT)
Received: from carter-zimmerman.suchdamage.org ([69.25.196.178] helo=carter-zimmerman.mit.edu) by ietf-mx.ietf.org with esmtp (Exim 4.43) id 1EVWns-0001kn-5l for pesci-discuss@ietf.org; Fri, 28 Oct 2005 12:10:07 -0400
Received: by carter-zimmerman.mit.edu (Postfix, from userid 8042) id 989C4E0049; Fri, 28 Oct 2005 11:55:52 -0400 (EDT)
To: Brian E Carpenter <brc@zurich.ibm.com>
Subject: Re: Plenary [Re: [Pesci-discuss] Growing concerns about PESCI]
References: <web-3031527@multicasttech.com> <92CDAD938E5F923C2ABA7F9B@scan.jck.com> <09a301c5d999$73510380$20a623c0@china.huawei.com> <4360E2F7.5020503@zurich.ibm.com>
From: Sam Hartman <hartmans-ietf@mit.edu>
Date: Fri, 28 Oct 2005 11:55:52 -0400
In-Reply-To: <4360E2F7.5020503@zurich.ibm.com> (Brian E. Carpenter's message of "Thu, 27 Oct 2005 16:23:51 +0200")
Message-ID: <tslr7a5ws8n.fsf@cz.mit.edu>
User-Agent: Gnus/5.1006 (Gnus v5.10.6) Emacs/21.3 (gnu/linux)
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
X-Spam-Score: 0.0 (/)
X-Scan-Signature: 93238566e09e6e262849b4f805833007
Cc: pesci-discuss@ietf.org
X-BeenThere: pesci-discuss@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5
Precedence: list
List-Id: Process Evolution Study Committee of the IETF discussion <pesci-discuss.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www1.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/pesci-discuss>, <mailto:pesci-discuss-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://www1.ietf.org/pipermail/pesci-discuss>
List-Post: <mailto:pesci-discuss@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:pesci-discuss-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www1.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/pesci-discuss>, <mailto:pesci-discuss-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
Sender: pesci-discuss-bounces@ietf.org
Errors-To: pesci-discuss-bounces@ietf.org

>>>>> "Brian" == Brian E Carpenter <brc@zurich.ibm.com> writes:

    Brian> Spencer Dawkins wrote:
    >> Wherever else this discussion heads off to, can we assume that
    >> "reporting from the BOF to the plenary after a break" is OFF
    >> the table? Even 24 hours to absorb the discussion would be an
    >> improvement...

    Brian> I would agree in principle but a) the agenda is very
    Brian> constrained already b) I can't imagine saying *nothing* in
    Brian> plenary but clearly it cannot be a report beyond the very
    Brian> bare facts (we met, we discussed, we [dis]agreed).



It's my opinion as one of the sponsoring ADs that the scheduling
problem is critical.  I'm working with Brian, Bert and marsha to find
a proposed solution.

If I find one, I will propose it on pesci-discuss and copy the ietf
list.

--Sam


_______________________________________________
Pesci-discuss mailing list
Pesci-discuss@ietf.org
https://www1.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/pesci-discuss

v2.8.7 | Report a Bug | By Email