[Pesci-discuss] Re: Principles and mission (Re: Almost certainly)

Actually I realised yesterday (thanks to Sam's nagging - it's good to have
an AD to keep me honest) that we need to separate three types:

1) Basic, hopefully invariant, IETF principles
2) Principles for necessary process changes
3) Principles for a new process to change the process

Having reviewed the mission statement and a lot of other stuff prior
to the PESCI draft, I'm not 100% convinced that the mission statement
captures every single part of 1), but I think the problem here is
to capture 2) and 3) and separate 2) from 3). Our draft
is not clear enough about that yet.

     Brian

Harald Tveit Alvestrand wrote:
> 
> 
> --On 27. oktober 2005 16:47 +0200 Brian E Carpenter <brc@zurich.ibm.com> 
> wrote:
> 
>> Another point to consider is whether we did the right thing in
>> pushing the laundry list of raw principles off into an Appendix.
>> But we do need to be very clear about separating basic, unchanging
>> principles from the specific principles for change. Maybe the basics
>> should be spun off as a completely separate item of work?
> 
> 
> I'm *somewhat* biased, but I think we captured a pretty basic set of 
> principles in the IETF Mission Statement.
> I'd like to get our principles sorted into 3 groups:
> 
> - Basic Principles that are in the mission statement. Remove and replace 
> with pointer.
> - Basic Principles that should have been in the mission statement. Refer 
> to a mission statement upgrade. (I *hope* that's an empty list.....)
> - Guiding Principles and Change Prinicples that follow from the 
> prinicples in the mission statement. They belong here.
> 
> Does that make sense? At all?
> 
> 
> 

_______________________________________________
Pesci-discuss mailing list
Pesci-discuss@ietf.org
https://www1.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/pesci-discuss