Re: [Pesci-discuss] Re: Fw: Last NomCom 2005/06 Call for Volunteers

Harald Tveit Alvestrand <harald@alvestrand.no> Sun, 09 October 2005 18:48 UTC

Received: from localhost.localdomain ([127.0.0.1] helo=megatron.ietf.org) by megatron.ietf.org with esmtp (Exim 4.32) id 1EOgDh-0000os-Qe; Sun, 09 Oct 2005 14:48:25 -0400
Received: from odin.ietf.org ([132.151.1.176] helo=ietf.org) by megatron.ietf.org with esmtp (Exim 4.32) id 1EOgDh-0000on-1P for pesci-discuss@megatron.ietf.org; Sun, 09 Oct 2005 14:48:25 -0400
Received: from ietf-mx.ietf.org (ietf-mx [132.151.6.1]) by ietf.org (8.9.1a/8.9.1a) with ESMTP id OAA01962 for <pesci-discuss@ietf.org>; Sun, 9 Oct 2005 14:48:23 -0400 (EDT)
Received: from eikenes.alvestrand.no ([158.38.152.233]) by ietf-mx.ietf.org with esmtp (Exim 4.43) id 1EOgNQ-0002ru-J8 for pesci-discuss@ietf.org; Sun, 09 Oct 2005 14:58:29 -0400
Received: from localhost (eikenes.alvestrand.no [127.0.0.1]) by eikenes.alvestrand.no (Postfix) with ESMTP id F0398258084; Sun, 9 Oct 2005 20:47:46 +0200 (CEST)
Received: from eikenes.alvestrand.no ([127.0.0.1]) by localhost (eikenes.alvestrand.no [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id 05930-07; Sun, 9 Oct 2005 20:47:42 +0200 (CEST)
Received: from [192.168.1.145] (163.80-203-220.nextgentel.com [80.203.220.163]) by eikenes.alvestrand.no (Postfix) with ESMTP id 57D18258082; Sun, 9 Oct 2005 20:47:42 +0200 (CEST)
Date: Sun, 09 Oct 2005 20:48:09 +0200
From: Harald Tveit Alvestrand <harald@alvestrand.no>
To: Michael Richardson <mcr@sandelman.ottawa.on.ca>, pesci-discuss@ietf.org
Subject: Re: [Pesci-discuss] Re: Fw: Last NomCom 2005/06 Call for Volunteers
Message-ID: <6BA7142EDC3EC069047016EE@gloppen.hjemme.alvestrand.no>
In-Reply-To: <v0fyray5gk.fsf@marajade.sandelman.ottawa.on.ca>
References: <103f01c5c8f8$61dd8800$0500a8c0@china.huawei.com> <Pine.LNX.4.61.0510041853310.24109@netcore.fi> <v0fyray5gk.fsf@marajade.sandelman.ottawa.on.ca>
X-Mailer: Mulberry/3.1.6 (Linux/x86)
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=iso-8859-1; format=flowed
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
Content-Disposition: inline
X-Virus-Scanned: by amavisd-new at alvestrand.no
X-Spam-Score: 0.0 (/)
X-Scan-Signature: 9466e0365fc95844abaf7c3f15a05c7d
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
Cc:
X-BeenThere: pesci-discuss@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5
Precedence: list
List-Id: Process Evolution Study Committee of the IETF discussion <pesci-discuss.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www1.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/pesci-discuss>, <mailto:pesci-discuss-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://www1.ietf.org/pipermail/pesci-discuss>
List-Post: <mailto:pesci-discuss@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:pesci-discuss-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www1.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/pesci-discuss>, <mailto:pesci-discuss-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
Sender: pesci-discuss-bounces@ietf.org
Errors-To: pesci-discuss-bounces@ietf.org


--On søndag, oktober 09, 2005 13:18:19 -0400 Michael Richardson 
<mcr@sandelman.ottawa.on.ca> wrote:

>   There is a further bias --- tight travel budgets in the past years have
> meant that the lower IETF meeting numbers mean fewer are actually elible
> for nomcom.
>
>   I buy would like to see the nomcom eligibility guidelines changed a bit.
> Perhaps if you qualified at some point in the past for nomcom, that it
> changes your future elibility criteria.

I don't think the number of eligible people has dropped very much - and we 
just changed it from "2 out of 3" to "3 out of 5", which stretches the 
period a bit.

We might want to ask the record-keepers if "3 out of 6" makes any 
difference (my guesstimator says that it's probably marginal).

I wouldn't want to have nomcom people who'd been completely out of touch 
for the last year or more.... and meeting attendance is the only objective 
measure we've come up with....






_______________________________________________
Pesci-discuss mailing list
Pesci-discuss@ietf.org
https://www1.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/pesci-discuss