IETF Logo Mail Archive

Re: Plenary [Re: [Pesci-discuss] Growing concerns about PESCI]

Scott W Brim <swb@employees.org> Thu, 27 October 2005 14:44 UTC

Received: from localhost.localdomain ([127.0.0.1] helo=megatron.ietf.org) by megatron.ietf.org with esmtp (Exim 4.32) id 1EV8z6-0005gu-Tz; Thu, 27 Oct 2005 10:44:04 -0400
Received: from odin.ietf.org ([132.151.1.176] helo=ietf.org) by megatron.ietf.org with esmtp (Exim 4.32) id 1EV8z5-0005eJ-V1 for pesci-discuss@megatron.ietf.org; Thu, 27 Oct 2005 10:44:04 -0400
Received: from ietf-mx.ietf.org (ietf-mx [132.151.6.1]) by ietf.org (8.9.1a/8.9.1a) with ESMTP id KAA03693 for <pesci-discuss@ietf.org>; Thu, 27 Oct 2005 10:43:48 -0400 (EDT)
Received: from sj-iport-4.cisco.com ([171.68.10.86]) by ietf-mx.ietf.org with esmtp (Exim 4.43) id 1EV9CS-0004NL-Se for pesci-discuss@ietf.org; Thu, 27 Oct 2005 10:57:54 -0400
Received: from sj-core-4.cisco.com ([171.68.223.138]) by sj-iport-4.cisco.com with ESMTP; 27 Oct 2005 07:43:53 -0700
Received: from xbh-rtp-211.amer.cisco.com (xbh-rtp-211.cisco.com [64.102.31.102]) by sj-core-4.cisco.com (8.12.10/8.12.6) with ESMTP id j9REhoUw016611; Thu, 27 Oct 2005 07:43:51 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from xfe-rtp-202.amer.cisco.com ([64.102.31.21]) by xbh-rtp-211.amer.cisco.com with Microsoft SMTPSVC(6.0.3790.211); Thu, 27 Oct 2005 10:43:44 -0400
Received: from cisco.com ([10.86.240.194]) by xfe-rtp-202.amer.cisco.com with Microsoft SMTPSVC(6.0.3790.211); Thu, 27 Oct 2005 10:43:44 -0400
Date: Thu, 27 Oct 2005 10:43:30 -0400
From: Scott W Brim <swb@employees.org>
To: Brian E Carpenter <brc@zurich.ibm.com>
Subject: Re: Plenary [Re: [Pesci-discuss] Growing concerns about PESCI]
Message-ID: <20051027144329.GC5392@sbrim-wxp01>
References: <web-3031527@multicasttech.com> <92CDAD938E5F923C2ABA7F9B@scan.jck.com> <09a301c5d999$73510380$20a623c0@china.huawei.com> <4360E2F7.5020503@zurich.ibm.com>
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
Content-Disposition: inline
In-Reply-To: <4360E2F7.5020503@zurich.ibm.com>
User-Agent: Mutt/1.4.2.1i
X-OriginalArrivalTime: 27 Oct 2005 14:43:44.0787 (UTC) FILETIME=[D4E22630:01C5DB04]
X-Spam-Score: 0.0 (/)
X-Scan-Signature: 798b2e660f1819ae38035ac1d8d5e3ab
Cc: pesci-discuss@ietf.org
X-BeenThere: pesci-discuss@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5
Precedence: list
List-Id: Process Evolution Study Committee of the IETF discussion <pesci-discuss.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www1.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/pesci-discuss>, <mailto:pesci-discuss-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://www1.ietf.org/pipermail/pesci-discuss>
List-Post: <mailto:pesci-discuss@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:pesci-discuss-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www1.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/pesci-discuss>, <mailto:pesci-discuss-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
Sender: pesci-discuss-bounces@ietf.org
Errors-To: pesci-discuss-bounces@ietf.org

On Thu, Oct 27, 2005 04:23:51PM +0200, Brian E Carpenter allegedly wrote:
> Spencer Dawkins wrote:
> >Wherever else this discussion heads off to, can we assume that 
> >"reporting from the BOF to the plenary after a break" is OFF the table? 
> >Even 24 hours to absorb the discussion would be an improvement...
> 
> I would agree in principle but
> a) the agenda is very constrained already
> b) I can't imagine saying *nothing* in plenary but clearly it
>    cannot be a report beyond the very bare facts (we met,
>    we discussed, we [dis]agreed).

Personally I think that can amount to a very substantial report.  You
can take "bare facts" and distill out trends and issues.  What were
the fundamental issues brought up and discussed?  Where do we have
consensus already (this will show shared core values)?  Where we
didn't have consensus, what are the *types* of positions?  And so on.
That gives the plenary a snapshot of the agreements and problems that
the pesci process is going to be up against, and the plenary can take
it from there.

swb

_______________________________________________
Pesci-discuss mailing list
Pesci-discuss@ietf.org
https://www1.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/pesci-discuss

v2.8.7 | Report a Bug | By Email