Re: [Pesci-discuss] IETF chair issue [Question: stability of IAB]

On Fri, 21 Oct 2005, Brian E Carpenter wrote:
> IESG workload and chasing up the sources of delay.
> And that isn't because I don't know what needs to be
> done - actually Bill Fenner has a web page that tells
> me exactly which documents need extra attention.
>
> http://rtg.ietf.org:8080/Test/tracker_exceptions

It's great to see that such a page is finally up, even as 
experimental.

For example, if a doc languishes in 'publication requested', 'AD 
evaluation' or whatever for 100+ days, we can hardly be proud of the 
result. That's also a very good way to kill the WG's, editors', etc. 
enthusiasm on the work.

Is the IESG doing something about this list, both:
  - in preventive steps, decreasing the likelihood that new docs get on
    "seriously delayed" stage (e.g., in each telechat, look at 10-15
    docs which have just appeared on the list or crossed some
    more serious threshold), and
  - getting the already seriously delayed docs moving again (e.g., in
    each telechat, discuss the 10 or 15 "worst cases")

-- 
Pekka Savola                 "You each name yourselves king, yet the
Netcore Oy                    kingdom bleeds."
Systems. Networks. Security. -- George R.R. Martin: A Clash of Kings

_______________________________________________
Pesci-discuss mailing list
Pesci-discuss@ietf.org
https://www1.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/pesci-discuss