[Pesci-discuss] pesci-next-steps

-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
Hash: SHA1

Elwyn, I read your nice simple document today.
I felt an immediate response was waranteed, so I'm typing on the bus.

I agree with everything.

Please I'd improve.
2.0:	recall I kept asking if this was the meta-process or
	the meta-meta-process.

I want to suggest that this be made explicite --- your document
is describing a meta-meta-process. 
      process:		      what a WG uses (such as "IPSEC")
      meta-process:	      what a meta-WG uses (such as "newtrk")
      meta-meta-process:      your document

2.1:  I think it is important to say that your meta-meta-process is
      simply a choice of a common IETF methodology --- the design team.
      i.e. no new technology is being proposed.

      It should be clear that newtrk, for instance, didn't really go
      the design team method. To a large extent, I'd call all WG lists
      "self-selected committee of the whole".
      A design team is often not self-selected, and does not represent
      the whole.

3.0:  you could consider reducing the problem set to just "IETF Chair",
      I doubt that any solution could be found to deal with that problem
      that didn't involve the IESG.

Maybe, instead of worrying about how to streamline the IETF, we should
restrict ourself to streamlining the IESG.

<SOLUTIONISM>
I would see things like bringing the IRTF in formally under the IAB,
maybe changing the name from "IETF #65 meeting" to "IAB #65 plenary".

I'd like to see things like having people/design-team publish an
Informational RFC as being the basis for a WG charter, for instance.
</SOLUTIONISM>

- -- 
]       ON HUMILITY: to err is human. To moo, bovine.           |  firewalls  [
]   Michael Richardson,    Xelerance Corporation, Ottawa, ON    |net architect[
] mcr@xelerance.com      http://www.sandelman.ottawa.on.ca/mcr/ |device driver[
] panic("Just another Debian GNU/Linux using, kernel hacking, security guy"); [
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: GnuPG v1.4.1 (GNU/Linux)
Comment: Finger me for keys

iQEVAwUBQ/4yaYCLcPvd0N1lAQIjkwf6AhaW9813ki5ZgaeLGuyd3+af0EyuGgnR
lkw5jahhMorIVu/sORAfdeFsrdpRn+N2k43pMCcTyafqmAMuPICVswm1qMIGorTR
JTPLKA2OGPK4/1gACXFqpzPnfNWtHoTvXSH1rE5HKz9w4uA4YPVaX5jOT36ljV1o
9RCJIPOGJDNsGhwv4rcBbV078C1EpajtSiCwVhcS+lXbvC9eK7scOWbJ5mf0Is+5
5D3UOzZUNSRfK0twoLoDmA/9ype7Ll/Wh8jr/1LZArUDcqK7uvjWjZIsYPYCG3pF
xvPTIwMGwOeFEb0W9IoiXa7UPJtTUJae9+T2y0dH2WwSZVOeGDgNQA==
=FrmA
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----

_______________________________________________
Pesci-discuss mailing list
Pesci-discuss@ietf.org
https://www1.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/pesci-discuss