IETF Logo Mail Archive

Re: [Pesci-discuss] Question: stability of IAB

Melinda Shore <mshore@cisco.com> Wed, 19 October 2005 13:13 UTC

Received: from localhost.localdomain ([127.0.0.1] helo=megatron.ietf.org) by megatron.ietf.org with esmtp (Exim 4.32) id 1ESDl1-0005Ej-2o; Wed, 19 Oct 2005 09:13:27 -0400
Received: from odin.ietf.org ([132.151.1.176] helo=ietf.org) by megatron.ietf.org with esmtp (Exim 4.32) id 1ESDkz-0005Eb-3y for pesci-discuss@megatron.ietf.org; Wed, 19 Oct 2005 09:13:25 -0400
Received: from ietf-mx.ietf.org (ietf-mx [132.151.6.1]) by ietf.org (8.9.1a/8.9.1a) with ESMTP id JAA15636 for <pesci-discuss@ietf.org>; Wed, 19 Oct 2005 09:13:15 -0400 (EDT)
Received: from rtp-iport-1.cisco.com ([64.102.122.148]) by ietf-mx.ietf.org with esmtp (Exim 4.43) id 1ESDwh-00034V-Vg for pesci-discuss@ietf.org; Wed, 19 Oct 2005 09:25:33 -0400
Received: from rtp-core-2.cisco.com ([64.102.124.13]) by rtp-iport-1.cisco.com with ESMTP; 19 Oct 2005 06:13:11 -0700
X-BrightmailFiltered: true
X-Brightmail-Tracker: AAAAAA==
X-IronPort-AV: i="3.97,231,1125903600"; d="scan'208"; a="13469097:sNHT21240204"
Received: from xbh-rtp-201.amer.cisco.com (xbh-rtp-201.cisco.com [64.102.31.12]) by rtp-core-2.cisco.com (8.12.10/8.12.6) with ESMTP id j9JDCsEw021575; Wed, 19 Oct 2005 09:13:08 -0400 (EDT)
Received: from xmb-rtp-205.amer.cisco.com ([64.102.31.59]) by xbh-rtp-201.amer.cisco.com with Microsoft SMTPSVC(6.0.3790.211); Wed, 19 Oct 2005 09:12:53 -0400
Received: from 10.82.240.204 ([10.82.240.204]) by xmb-rtp-205.amer.cisco.com ([64.102.31.59]) via Exchange Front-End Server email.cisco.com ([64.102.31.21]) with Microsoft Exchange Server HTTP-DAV ; Wed, 19 Oct 2005 13:12:53 +0000
User-Agent: Microsoft-Entourage/11.0.0.040405
Date: Wed, 19 Oct 2005 09:12:49 -0400
Subject: Re: [Pesci-discuss] Question: stability of IAB
From: Melinda Shore <mshore@cisco.com>
To: Sam Hartman <hartmans-ietf@mit.edu>, <pesci-discuss@ietf.org>
Message-ID: <BF7BBE91.270A%mshore@cisco.com>
In-Reply-To: <tslk6g9rfsj.fsf@cz.mit.edu>
Mime-version: 1.0
Content-type: text/plain; charset="US-ASCII"
Content-transfer-encoding: 7bit
X-OriginalArrivalTime: 19 Oct 2005 13:12:53.0655 (UTC) FILETIME=[D0736A70:01C5D4AE]
X-Spam-Score: 0.0 (/)
X-Scan-Signature: 68c8cc8a64a9d0402e43b8eee9fc4199
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Cc:
X-BeenThere: pesci-discuss@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5
Precedence: list
List-Id: Process Evolution Study Committee of the IETF discussion <pesci-discuss.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www1.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/pesci-discuss>, <mailto:pesci-discuss-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://www1.ietf.org/pipermail/pesci-discuss>
List-Post: <mailto:pesci-discuss@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:pesci-discuss-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www1.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/pesci-discuss>, <mailto:pesci-discuss-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
Sender: pesci-discuss-bounces@ietf.org
Errors-To: pesci-discuss-bounces@ietf.org

On 10/19/05 5:56 AM, "Sam Hartman" <hartmans-ietf@mit.edu> wrote:
> I don't know what the answer is, but I think it important to consider
> carefully before deciding the IAB's role is stable.

Stable over what period?  I think perhaps there's an issue with
the IAB's output not being taken to heart but the reasons for
that may not be structural.  Unless what's under discussion is
some truly radical transformation of the decision-making processes,
it probably does make sense to assume the IAB's role is stable
for the time being but may change in the future.

Melinda

_______________________________________________
Pesci-discuss mailing list
Pesci-discuss@ietf.org
https://www1.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/pesci-discuss

v2.8.7 | Report a Bug | By Email