[Pesci-discuss] Minutes for PESCI team meeting 12/10/05
Brian E Carpenter <brc@zurich.ibm.com> Tue, 18 October 2005 07:10 UTC
Received: from localhost.localdomain ([127.0.0.1] helo=megatron.ietf.org)
by megatron.ietf.org with esmtp (Exim 4.32)
id 1ERlcL-0001kM-SB; Tue, 18 Oct 2005 03:10:37 -0400
Received: from odin.ietf.org ([132.151.1.176] helo=ietf.org)
by megatron.ietf.org with esmtp (Exim 4.32) id 1ERlcK-0001kE-6W
for pesci-discuss@megatron.ietf.org; Tue, 18 Oct 2005 03:10:36 -0400
Received: from ietf-mx.ietf.org (ietf-mx [132.151.6.1])
by ietf.org (8.9.1a/8.9.1a) with ESMTP id DAA09084
for <pesci-discuss@ietf.org>; Tue, 18 Oct 2005 03:10:29 -0400 (EDT)
Received: from mtagate1.de.ibm.com ([195.212.29.150])
by ietf-mx.ietf.org with esmtp (Exim 4.43) id 1ERlno-0003AW-7a
for pesci-discuss@ietf.org; Tue, 18 Oct 2005 03:22:28 -0400
Received: from d12nrmr1607.megacenter.de.ibm.com
(d12nrmr1607.megacenter.de.ibm.com [9.149.167.49])
by mtagate1.de.ibm.com (8.12.10/8.12.10) with ESMTP id j9I7AQrO070904
for <pesci-discuss@ietf.org>; Tue, 18 Oct 2005 07:10:26 GMT
Received: from d12av03.megacenter.de.ibm.com (d12av03.megacenter.de.ibm.com
[9.149.165.213])
by d12nrmr1607.megacenter.de.ibm.com (8.12.10/NCO/VERS6.7) with ESMTP
id j9I7AQr4218454
for <pesci-discuss@ietf.org>; Tue, 18 Oct 2005 09:10:26 +0200
Received: from d12av03.megacenter.de.ibm.com (loopback [127.0.0.1])
by d12av03.megacenter.de.ibm.com (8.12.11/8.13.3) with ESMTP id
j9I7AQN7004638
for <pesci-discuss@ietf.org>; Tue, 18 Oct 2005 09:10:26 +0200
Received: from sihl.zurich.ibm.com (sihl.zurich.ibm.com [9.4.16.232])
by d12av03.megacenter.de.ibm.com (8.12.11/8.12.11) with ESMTP id
j9I7APdL004632
for <pesci-discuss@ietf.org>; Tue, 18 Oct 2005 09:10:25 +0200
Received: from zurich.ibm.com (sig-9-145-129-216.de.ibm.com [9.145.129.216])
by sihl.zurich.ibm.com (AIX4.3/8.9.3p2/8.9.3) with ESMTP id JAA25528
for <pesci-discuss@ietf.org>; Tue, 18 Oct 2005 09:10:24 +0200
Message-ID: <43549FE0.40805@zurich.ibm.com>
Date: Tue, 18 Oct 2005 09:10:24 +0200
From: Brian E Carpenter <brc@zurich.ibm.com>
Organization: IBM
User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Windows; U; Windows NT 5.1; en-US;
rv:1.6) Gecko/20040113
X-Accept-Language: en, fr, de
MIME-Version: 1.0
To: pesci-discuss@ietf.org
X-Priority: 3)
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii; format=flowed
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
X-Spam-Score: 0.8 (/)
X-Scan-Signature: 7aafa0432175920a4b3e118e16c5cb64
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Subject: [Pesci-discuss] Minutes for PESCI team meeting 12/10/05
X-BeenThere: pesci-discuss@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5
Precedence: list
List-Id: Process Evolution Study Committee of the IETF discussion
<pesci-discuss.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www1.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/pesci-discuss>,
<mailto:pesci-discuss-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://www1.ietf.org/pipermail/pesci-discuss>
List-Post: <mailto:pesci-discuss@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:pesci-discuss-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www1.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/pesci-discuss>,
<mailto:pesci-discuss-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
Sender: pesci-discuss-bounces@ietf.org
Errors-To: pesci-discuss-bounces@ietf.org
(Sent for Adrian Farrel)
PESCI meeting 12th October 2005, 2pm GMT
Michael, Elwyn, Scott, Brian, Harald, Adrian
Adrian taking notes
Agenda
- BOF
- Provide clarity for final edit by Elwyn
* BOF
- BOF will be hosted by Bert and Sam as Gen Area ADs
- Sam and Bert will decide who will chair
- PESCI team doesn't mind who chairs so long as:
- fair and neutral
- has some clue about IETF process
* Open issues with revision F of the draft
- Discussed the level of support required within the IETF for process
change
- Talked around issue of "making it as easy as possible for open
participation"
- Used input from pesci-discuss and existing RFCs
- Listed current capabilities needed by ADs
- technically competent
- human managers
- operational managers
- developers of process
Agreed that these capabilities do not all constitute a principle, but
the first
two probably do.
- Discussed which component bodies/roles are stable
- Considered in particular what role the IAB should have in process
change
- Identified potential issues when roles overlap
* Next Steps (section in I-D)
- Examined whether a design team is appropriate and acceptable
as a way of advancing process change. Issues include:
- A design team is able to focus and produce work for open discussion
- The design team would need a charter
- How does the design team get formed?
- Multiple design teams are acceptable
* Next Steps (for PESCI work)
- Further round of feedback from team to Elwyn ASAP (within 12 hours)
- New version of I-D delivered to team by start of US business Friday
- Comments back to Elwyn by Sunday evening
- Aim to submit on or before 17th October
[is in I-D queue right now...]
_______________________________________________
Pesci-discuss mailing list
Pesci-discuss@ietf.org
https://www1.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/pesci-discuss
- [Pesci-discuss] Minutes for PESCI team meeting 12… Brian E Carpenter