Re: [Pesci-discuss] Growing concerns about PESCI

[Leslie Daigle <[e-mail]>]

I've respected your cc trim, but will observe that you
are assuming PESCI is a WG, which is not clear to me,
and it doesn't strike me this is a PESCI issue.

Marshall Eubanks wrote:
> Or, maybe I missed something, but is a design team ever *required* to act on points raised on the
> miling list ? IIRC IETF does not operate on votes.


I started writing that thought when I asked myself why I
would bother to contribute to the PESCI discuss mailing
list.  My time (like everyone else's on this list) is
valuable.  I *contribute* to WGs because it's a contribution
to an open WG effort, whether or not the design team picks up
on it.

If you want to say "it doesn't matter, it's all bits in the
wind until there's a final document proposal that goes through
last call", then that's fine:  it's your answer to my question.
But it also doesn't answer whether we need to bother with
WGs at all (for other topics).

Leslie.




_______________________________________________
Pesci-discuss mailing list
[e-mail]
https://www1.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/pesci-discuss