[Pesci-discuss] Can we focus on the important and specific?

Brian E Carpenter <brc@zurich.ibm.com> Mon, 24 October 2005 11:23 UTC

Received: from localhost.localdomain ([127.0.0.1] helo=megatron.ietf.org) by megatron.ietf.org with esmtp (Exim 4.32) id 1EU0Qc-0008W1-5s; Mon, 24 Oct 2005 07:23:46 -0400
Received: from odin.ietf.org ([132.151.1.176] helo=ietf.org) by megatron.ietf.org with esmtp (Exim 4.32) id 1EU0QZ-0008Vp-Ut for pesci-discuss@megatron.ietf.org; Mon, 24 Oct 2005 07:23:43 -0400
Received: from ietf-mx.ietf.org (ietf-mx [132.151.6.1]) by ietf.org (8.9.1a/8.9.1a) with ESMTP id HAA02735 for <pesci-discuss@ietf.org>; Mon, 24 Oct 2005 07:23:30 -0400 (EDT)
Received: from mtagate2.uk.ibm.com ([195.212.29.135]) by ietf-mx.ietf.org with esmtp (Exim 4.43) id 1EU0dJ-0007bz-1E for pesci-discuss@ietf.org; Mon, 24 Oct 2005 07:36:54 -0400
Received: from d06nrmr1407.portsmouth.uk.ibm.com (d06nrmr1407.portsmouth.uk.ibm.com [9.149.38.185]) by mtagate2.uk.ibm.com (8.12.10/8.12.10) with ESMTP id j9OBNUcO146550 for <pesci-discuss@ietf.org>; Mon, 24 Oct 2005 11:23:31 GMT
Received: from d06av04.portsmouth.uk.ibm.com (d06av04.portsmouth.uk.ibm.com [9.149.37.216]) by d06nrmr1407.portsmouth.uk.ibm.com (8.12.10/NCO/VERS6.7) with ESMTP id j9OBNUhN226352 for <pesci-discuss@ietf.org>; Mon, 24 Oct 2005 12:23:30 +0100
Received: from d06av04.portsmouth.uk.ibm.com (loopback [127.0.0.1]) by d06av04.portsmouth.uk.ibm.com (8.12.11/8.13.3) with ESMTP id j9OBNUuS023558 for <pesci-discuss@ietf.org>; Mon, 24 Oct 2005 12:23:30 +0100
Received: from sihl.zurich.ibm.com (sihl.zurich.ibm.com [9.4.16.232]) by d06av04.portsmouth.uk.ibm.com (8.12.11/8.12.11) with ESMTP id j9OBNTem023546 for <pesci-discuss@ietf.org>; Mon, 24 Oct 2005 12:23:29 +0100
Received: from zurich.ibm.com (sig-9-145-249-134.de.ibm.com [9.145.249.134]) by sihl.zurich.ibm.com (AIX4.3/8.9.3p2/8.9.3) with ESMTP id NAA71696 for <pesci-discuss@ietf.org>; Mon, 24 Oct 2005 13:23:23 +0200
Message-ID: <435CC42A.3000109@zurich.ibm.com>
Date: Mon, 24 Oct 2005 13:23:22 +0200
From: Brian E Carpenter <brc@zurich.ibm.com>
Organization: IBM
User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Windows; U; Windows NT 5.1; en-US; rv:1.6) Gecko/20040113
X-Accept-Language: en, fr, de
MIME-Version: 1.0
To: pesci-discuss@ietf.org
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii; format=flowed
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
X-Spam-Score: 0.0 (/)
X-Scan-Signature: 7d33c50f3756db14428398e2bdedd581
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Subject: [Pesci-discuss] Can we focus on the important and specific?
X-BeenThere: pesci-discuss@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5
Precedence: list
List-Id: Process Evolution Study Committee of the IETF discussion <pesci-discuss.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www1.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/pesci-discuss>, <mailto:pesci-discuss-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://www1.ietf.org/pipermail/pesci-discuss>
List-Post: <mailto:pesci-discuss@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:pesci-discuss-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www1.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/pesci-discuss>, <mailto:pesci-discuss-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
Sender: pesci-discuss-bounces@ietf.org
Errors-To: pesci-discuss-bounces@ietf.org

As the latest draft agenda says:

Discussion of PESCI Goals and Principles focussed on process change

It would be good if people could concentrate discussion in the
next two weeks on section 4 of
draft-davies-pesci-initial-considerations-00
and in particular these questions:

Which of the goals and principles in section 4 are most important
and would lead to specific changes in the process?

Which should be moved to the Appendix because they are less
important or do not lead to changes in the process?

What's missing that's important and would lead to specific
changes in the process?

     Brian



_______________________________________________
Pesci-discuss mailing list
Pesci-discuss@ietf.org
https://www1.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/pesci-discuss