[Pesci-discuss] the name

Dave Crocker <dhc@dcrocker.net> Wed, 21 September 2005 02:48 UTC

Received: from localhost.localdomain ([127.0.0.1] helo=megatron.ietf.org) by megatron.ietf.org with esmtp (Exim 4.32) id 1EHufG-0000OJ-Pa; Tue, 20 Sep 2005 22:48:54 -0400
Received: from odin.ietf.org ([132.151.1.176] helo=ietf.org) by megatron.ietf.org with esmtp (Exim 4.32) id 1EHufF-0000NV-0p for pesci-discuss@megatron.ietf.org; Tue, 20 Sep 2005 22:48:53 -0400
Received: from ietf-mx.ietf.org (ietf-mx [132.151.6.1]) by ietf.org (8.9.1a/8.9.1a) with ESMTP id WAA21956 for <pesci-discuss@ietf.org>; Tue, 20 Sep 2005 22:48:50 -0400 (EDT)
Received: from sb7.songbird.com ([208.184.79.137]) by ietf-mx.ietf.org with esmtp (Exim 4.43) id 1EHul8-0002XW-K7 for pesci-discuss@ietf.org; Tue, 20 Sep 2005 22:55:02 -0400
Received: from [192.168.0.3] (ppp-67-126-130-228.dsl.irvnca.pacbell.net [67.126.130.228]) (authenticated bits=0) by sb7.songbird.com (8.12.11/8.12.11) with ESMTP id j8L2nDZD005206 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=DHE-RSA-AES256-SHA bits=256 verify=NO) for <pesci-discuss@ietf.org>; Tue, 20 Sep 2005 19:49:14 -0700
Message-ID: <4330C9FB.5050509@dcrocker.net>
Date: Tue, 20 Sep 2005 19:48:27 -0700
From: Dave Crocker <dhc@dcrocker.net>
Organization: BrandenburgWorking Internet
User-Agent: Thunderbird 1.4 (Windows/20050908)
MIME-Version: 1.0
To: pesci-discuss@ietf.org
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
X-SongbirdInformation: support@songbird.com for more information
X-Songbird: Found to be clean
X-Songbird-From: dhc@dcrocker.net
X-Spam-Score: 0.1 (/)
X-Scan-Signature: 9182cfff02fae4f1b6e9349e01d62f32
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Subject: [Pesci-discuss] the name
X-BeenThere: pesci-discuss@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5
Precedence: list
Reply-To: dcrocker@bbiw.net
List-Id: Process Evolution Study Committee of the IETF discussion <pesci-discuss.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www1.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/pesci-discuss>, <mailto:pesci-discuss-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://www1.ietf.org/pipermail/pesci-discuss>
List-Post: <mailto:pesci-discuss@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:pesci-discuss-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www1.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/pesci-discuss>, <mailto:pesci-discuss-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
Sender: pesci-discuss-bounces@ietf.org
Errors-To: pesci-discuss-bounces@ietf.org

in an attempt to start discussion with a matter of some import:


I well might have missed Brian, or someone else, explaining this, but I'm not
clear how to pronounce this acronym.


It would make semantic sense to go in either of two directions:

1. "pesky" both because it is a pesky topic and because it requires paying
attention to pesky details

2. "peshy" because we are fishing for a solution.

Is there guidance on this dilemma?

d/
-- 

  Dave Crocker
  Brandenburg InternetWorking
  +1.408.246.8253
  dcrocker  a t ...
  WE'VE MOVED to:  www.bbiw.net

_______________________________________________
Pesci-discuss mailing list
Pesci-discuss@ietf.org
https://www1.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/pesci-discuss