IETF Logo Mail Archive

Re: [Pesci-discuss] Re: Fw: Last NomCom 2005/06 Call for Volunteers

Dave Crocker <dhc@dcrocker.net> Sun, 09 October 2005 20:14 UTC

Received: from localhost.localdomain ([127.0.0.1] helo=megatron.ietf.org) by megatron.ietf.org with esmtp (Exim 4.32) id 1EOhYk-0005uL-0k; Sun, 09 Oct 2005 16:14:14 -0400
Received: from odin.ietf.org ([132.151.1.176] helo=ietf.org) by megatron.ietf.org with esmtp (Exim 4.32) id 1EOhYi-0005uG-By for pesci-discuss@megatron.ietf.org; Sun, 09 Oct 2005 16:14:12 -0400
Received: from ietf-mx.ietf.org (ietf-mx [132.151.6.1]) by ietf.org (8.9.1a/8.9.1a) with ESMTP id QAA07122 for <pesci-discuss@ietf.org>; Sun, 9 Oct 2005 16:14:10 -0400 (EDT)
Received: from sb7.songbird.com ([208.184.79.137]) by ietf-mx.ietf.org with esmtp (Exim 4.43) id 1EOhiP-0005B3-Cp for pesci-discuss@ietf.org; Sun, 09 Oct 2005 16:24:18 -0400
Received: from [192.168.0.3] (adsl-67-126-143-66.dsl.irvnca.pacbell.net [67.126.143.66]) (authenticated bits=0) by sb7.songbird.com (8.12.11/8.12.11) with ESMTP id j99KEJuf029603 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=DHE-RSA-AES256-SHA bits=256 verify=NO) for <pesci-discuss@ietf.org>; Sun, 9 Oct 2005 13:14:23 -0700
Message-ID: <434979E5.4070608@dcrocker.net>
Date: Sun, 09 Oct 2005 13:13:25 -0700
From: Dave Crocker <dhc@dcrocker.net>
Organization: Brandenburg InternetWorking
User-Agent: Thunderbird 1.4 (Windows/20050908)
MIME-Version: 1.0
CC: pesci-discuss@ietf.org
Subject: Re: [Pesci-discuss] Re: Fw: Last NomCom 2005/06 Call for Volunteers
References: <103f01c5c8f8$61dd8800$0500a8c0@china.huawei.com> <Pine.LNX.4.61.0510041853310.24109@netcore.fi> <v0fyray5gk.fsf@marajade.sandelman.ottawa.on.ca> <6BA7142EDC3EC069047016EE@gloppen.hjemme.alvestrand.no>
In-Reply-To: <6BA7142EDC3EC069047016EE@gloppen.hjemme.alvestrand.no>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
X-SongbirdInformation: support@songbird.com for more information
X-Songbird: Found to be clean
X-Songbird-From: dhc@dcrocker.net
X-Spam-Score: 3.5 (+++)
X-Scan-Signature: 0bc60ec82efc80c84b8d02f4b0e4de22
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
X-BeenThere: pesci-discuss@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5
Precedence: list
Reply-To: dcrocker@bbiw.net
List-Id: Process Evolution Study Committee of the IETF discussion <pesci-discuss.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www1.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/pesci-discuss>, <mailto:pesci-discuss-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://www1.ietf.org/pipermail/pesci-discuss>
List-Post: <mailto:pesci-discuss@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:pesci-discuss-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www1.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/pesci-discuss>, <mailto:pesci-discuss-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
Sender: pesci-discuss-bounces@ietf.org
Errors-To: pesci-discuss-bounces@ietf.org

> I wouldn't want to have nomcom people who'd been completely out of 
> touch for the last year or more.... and meeting attendance is the only 
> objective measure we've come up with....

The current criteria do not require that nomcom people be "in touch" in 
any meaningful way. 

They must have attended some IETF meetings. 

There is no requirement that they have sat in working group meetings, 
performed any work, or thave any experience with IETF process.

When the community was more cohesive, showing up at meetings correlated 
well with deeper knowledge of the work and process of the IETF. 

That no longer holds true.

d/

-- 

  Dave Crocker
  Brandenburg InternetWorking
  +1.408.246.8253
  dcrocker  a t ...
  WE'VE MOVED to:  www.bbiw.net


_______________________________________________
Pesci-discuss mailing list
Pesci-discuss@ietf.org
https://www1.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/pesci-discuss

v2.8.7 | Report a Bug | By Email