IETF Logo Mail Archive

Re: [Pesci-discuss] Question: stability of IAB

Harald Tveit Alvestrand <harald@alvestrand.no> Wed, 19 October 2005 20:27 UTC

Received: from localhost.localdomain ([127.0.0.1] helo=megatron.ietf.org) by megatron.ietf.org with esmtp (Exim 4.32) id 1ESKWn-0006uc-St; Wed, 19 Oct 2005 16:27:13 -0400
Received: from odin.ietf.org ([132.151.1.176] helo=ietf.org) by megatron.ietf.org with esmtp (Exim 4.32) id 1ESKWg-0006pm-BN for pesci-discuss@megatron.ietf.org; Wed, 19 Oct 2005 16:27:12 -0400
Received: from ietf-mx.ietf.org (ietf-mx [132.151.6.1]) by ietf.org (8.9.1a/8.9.1a) with ESMTP id QAA22756 for <pesci-discuss@ietf.org>; Wed, 19 Oct 2005 16:26:56 -0400 (EDT)
Received: from eikenes.alvestrand.no ([158.38.152.233]) by ietf-mx.ietf.org with esmtp (Exim 4.43) id 1ESKiQ-0003LL-Jz for pesci-discuss@ietf.org; Wed, 19 Oct 2005 16:39:16 -0400
Received: from localhost (eikenes.alvestrand.no [127.0.0.1]) by eikenes.alvestrand.no (Postfix) with ESMTP id 6DD022596C0; Wed, 19 Oct 2005 22:26:18 +0200 (CEST)
Received: from eikenes.alvestrand.no ([127.0.0.1]) by localhost (eikenes.alvestrand.no [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id 09959-09; Wed, 19 Oct 2005 22:26:15 +0200 (CEST)
Received: from [192.168.1.160] (163.80-203-220.nextgentel.com [80.203.220.163]) by eikenes.alvestrand.no (Postfix) with ESMTP id 215212596BD; Wed, 19 Oct 2005 22:26:15 +0200 (CEST)
Date: Wed, 19 Oct 2005 22:27:25 +0200
From: Harald Tveit Alvestrand <harald@alvestrand.no>
To: Sam Hartman <hartmans-ietf@mit.edu>, Brian E Carpenter <brc@zurich.ibm.com>
Subject: Re: [Pesci-discuss] Question: stability of IAB
Message-ID: <9353F27F4CBC5F7EF5725440@svartdal.hjemme.alvestrand.no>
In-Reply-To: <tsly84p2uh3.fsf@cz.mit.edu>
References: <tslk6g9rfsj.fsf@cz.mit.edu> <43564988.600@zurich.ibm.com> <tsly84p2uh3.fsf@cz.mit.edu>
X-Mailer: Mulberry/3.1.6 (Linux/x86)
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii; format=flowed
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Content-Disposition: inline
X-Virus-Scanned: by amavisd-new at alvestrand.no
X-Spam-Score: 0.0 (/)
X-Scan-Signature: 7d33c50f3756db14428398e2bdedd581
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Cc: pesci-discuss@ietf.org
X-BeenThere: pesci-discuss@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5
Precedence: list
List-Id: Process Evolution Study Committee of the IETF discussion <pesci-discuss.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www1.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/pesci-discuss>, <mailto:pesci-discuss-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://www1.ietf.org/pipermail/pesci-discuss>
List-Post: <mailto:pesci-discuss@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:pesci-discuss-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www1.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/pesci-discuss>, <mailto:pesci-discuss-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
Sender: pesci-discuss-bounces@ietf.org
Errors-To: pesci-discuss-bounces@ietf.org


--On onsdag, oktober 19, 2005 15:10:48 -0400 Sam Hartman 
<hartmans-ietf@mit.edu> wrote:

>     Brian> I think one reason for that assumption is that the IAB
>     Brian> isn't on the critical path for the standards process,
>     Brian> except in the appeals case.  It is of course involved in a
>     Brian> consultative role in WG formation and many other places,
>     Brian> but it clearly isn't part of (for example) the generic
>     Brian> slowness problem.
>
>
> No, but for example it may be part of the solution to the early
> cross-area review problem.

Only if the IAB can delegate the task better than the IESG has been able to.





_______________________________________________
Pesci-discuss mailing list
Pesci-discuss@ietf.org
https://www1.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/pesci-discuss

v2.8.7 | Report a Bug | By Email