Re: [Pesci-discuss] Question: stability of IAB

At 18:17 19/10/2005, Jari Arkko wrote:
>However, we should be careful in not attempting
>to change too many variables at the same time.

Dear Jari,
there are two problems: the method for changes and some immediate changes.

The method is important, and probably more: the resulting culture to 
be ready to consider, to accept and to enforce changes.

>A priority order is needed.

This priorities should be set-up in considering the expected 
experience to analyse/valiated the method and the symbolic value to 
develop and ascertain the culture.

<>

>A couple of years ago IANA was on my
>list too, but the situation may now be better (?).

IMHO from current observation both inside and outside the IETF this 
is _the_ political and architectural target for changes. Protecting 
status quo would per se be a change because it would mean a 
protection action, I understand the IETF is not used to?

jfc

_______________________________________________
Pesci-discuss mailing list
Pesci-discuss@ietf.org
https://www1.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/pesci-discuss