Re: [Pesci-discuss] Question: stability of IAB

At 11:56 19/10/2005, Sam Hartman wrote:
>This is a question submitted as an individual.
>
>One of the claims made in the current draft is that the IAB would
>remain relatively stable throughout process change.

Full support of this. IAB has expressed at least two concerns I know of:

- RFC 3869 one can also read as questions on the way IAB should adapt 
to help better R&D
- the recent open mailing list on architectural issues. I consider as 
extremely positive, but a real change, which can bring new changes 
(going with ab evolution of the architectural vision)
jfc

>Have people carefully considered the the effectiveness of the IAB in
>its architectural role?  Are people being quiet and not proposing
>change because things are working fine and the IAB is providing
>valuable architectural guidance just the way we need it?  Or are
>people being quiet because the IAB is not in the way?
>
>I don't know what the answer is, but I think it important to consider
>carefully before deciding the IAB's role is stable.
>
>
>_______________________________________________
>Pesci-discuss mailing list
>Pesci-discuss@ietf.org
>https://www1.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/pesci-discuss

_______________________________________________
Pesci-discuss mailing list
Pesci-discuss@ietf.org
https://www1.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/pesci-discuss