IETF Logo Mail Archive

Re: Almost certainly (was Re: [Pesci-discuss] Finding and nurturing the bright sparks of genius)

Scott W Brim <swb@employees.org> Thu, 27 October 2005 14:59 UTC

Received: from localhost.localdomain ([127.0.0.1] helo=megatron.ietf.org) by megatron.ietf.org with esmtp (Exim 4.32) id 1EV9Do-00062l-6r; Thu, 27 Oct 2005 10:59:16 -0400
Received: from odin.ietf.org ([132.151.1.176] helo=ietf.org) by megatron.ietf.org with esmtp (Exim 4.32) id 1EV9Dn-00062X-3R for pesci-discuss@megatron.ietf.org; Thu, 27 Oct 2005 10:59:15 -0400
Received: from ietf-mx.ietf.org (ietf-mx [132.151.6.1]) by ietf.org (8.9.1a/8.9.1a) with ESMTP id KAA05611 for <pesci-discuss@ietf.org>; Thu, 27 Oct 2005 10:58:58 -0400 (EDT)
Received: from rtp-iport-1.cisco.com ([64.102.122.148]) by ietf-mx.ietf.org with esmtp (Exim 4.43) id 1EV9R9-0005Cz-K9 for pesci-discuss@ietf.org; Thu, 27 Oct 2005 11:13:04 -0400
Received: from rtp-core-1.cisco.com ([64.102.124.12]) by rtp-iport-1.cisco.com with ESMTP; 27 Oct 2005 07:59:02 -0700
X-BrightmailFiltered: true
X-Brightmail-Tracker: AAAAAA==
X-IronPort-AV: i="3.97,259,1125903600"; d="scan'208"; a="14015883:sNHT21951588"
Received: from xbh-rtp-201.amer.cisco.com (xbh-rtp-201.cisco.com [64.102.31.12]) by rtp-core-1.cisco.com (8.12.10/8.12.6) with ESMTP id j9REwR2Z029076; Thu, 27 Oct 2005 10:59:00 -0400 (EDT)
Received: from xfe-rtp-201.amer.cisco.com ([64.102.31.38]) by xbh-rtp-201.amer.cisco.com with Microsoft SMTPSVC(6.0.3790.211); Thu, 27 Oct 2005 10:58:55 -0400
Received: from cisco.com ([10.86.240.194]) by xfe-rtp-201.amer.cisco.com with Microsoft SMTPSVC(6.0.3790.211); Thu, 27 Oct 2005 10:58:54 -0400
Date: Thu, 27 Oct 2005 10:58:23 -0400
From: Scott W Brim <swb@employees.org>
To: Brian E Carpenter <brc@zurich.ibm.com>
Subject: Re: Almost certainly (was Re: [Pesci-discuss] Finding and nurturing the bright sparks of genius)
Message-ID: <20051027145823.GE5392@sbrim-wxp01>
References: <435F63E7.1050705@dial.pipex.com> <0b7d01c5da9d$538e6a10$20a623c0@china.huawei.com> <20051027115714.GS5392@sbrim-wxp01> <4360E880.9060104@zurich.ibm.com>
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
Content-Disposition: inline
In-Reply-To: <4360E880.9060104@zurich.ibm.com>
User-Agent: Mutt/1.4.2.1i
X-OriginalArrivalTime: 27 Oct 2005 14:58:55.0123 (UTC) FILETIME=[F37C6630:01C5DB06]
X-Spam-Score: 0.0 (/)
X-Scan-Signature: 30ac594df0e66ffa5a93eb4c48bcb014
Cc: pesci-discuss@ietf.org
X-BeenThere: pesci-discuss@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5
Precedence: list
List-Id: Process Evolution Study Committee of the IETF discussion <pesci-discuss.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www1.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/pesci-discuss>, <mailto:pesci-discuss-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://www1.ietf.org/pipermail/pesci-discuss>
List-Post: <mailto:pesci-discuss@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:pesci-discuss-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www1.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/pesci-discuss>, <mailto:pesci-discuss-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
Sender: pesci-discuss-bounces@ietf.org
Errors-To: pesci-discuss-bounces@ietf.org

On Thu, Oct 27, 2005 04:47:28PM +0200, Brian E Carpenter allegedly wrote:
> Another point to consider is whether we did the right thing in
> pushing the laundry list of raw principles off into an Appendix.
> But we do need to be very clear about separating basic, unchanging
> principles from the specific principles for change. Maybe the basics
> should be spun off as a completely separate item of work?

Yes.  We didn't have time.  I think we could take several months on
this.

_______________________________________________
Pesci-discuss mailing list
Pesci-discuss@ietf.org
https://www1.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/pesci-discuss

v2.8.7 | Report a Bug | By Email