Re: Declarers of consensus (Re: [Pesci-discuss] My Notes)

--On torsdag, oktober 20, 2005 09:46:24 -0500 Spencer Dawkins 
<spencer@mcsr-labs.org> wrote:

>> I think the answer's likely to be "the team discusses its result openly
>> in  the IETF, using process X, and some person designated by the IETF
>> chair  declares that he has concluded that the IETF has consensus".
>
> If this is the right answer, it would be good to designate "some person"
> pretty quickly. The alternative is that the choice of "some person", and
> community acceptance of /acquiescence in the team result, get discussed
> at the same time - if you don't like the team result and think "some
> person" likes the team result, you're likely to push back on both.

I think it would have to be decided at effort start time, as part of the 
"charter" for the design-team-like thing (DTLT?); the logical candidates 
are the leader of the DTLT and "some person or group outside the DTLT".

Corresponding case in WG: WG chair as part of design team, leading it, or 
outside of it.

_______________________________________________
Pesci-discuss mailing list
Pesci-discuss@ietf.org
https://www1.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/pesci-discuss