[Pesci-discuss] Re: IETF chair issue [Question: stability of IAB]

I don't disagree with what you say below. Yes
there are problems that deserve attention. You
are still doing a fine job under the circumstances,
IMHO.

But the original question was what are
the most critical issues that the IETF
should handle first, assuming we can't
do everything overnight. I didn't think this
particular item belonged to the most critical
list for a number of reasons, including the
existence of more serious problems and/or
potential for bigger payoff, the expected ability
of your IESG co-workers for being a rather
self-managed set of folks and already designated
drivers for each individual issue that your web
page lists. Also, if the solution is adding ADs
then it may be that those ADs are more badly
needed for other purposes.

--Jari

Brian E Carpenter wrote:

> Jari,
>
>> I don't think IETF chair issue belongs to the list of
>> most critical items (Brian seems to be doing fine
>> here...).
>
>
> I need to explain frankly why I disagree.
>
> Thanks for the compliment, but my personal feeling is
> that despite working long hours and trying to be
> efficient, I am *not* doing a good job of managing the
> IESG workload and chasing up the sources of delay.
> And that isn't because I don't know what needs to be
> done - actually Bill Fenner has a web page that tells
> me exactly which documents need extra attention.
>
> http://rtg.ietf.org:8080/Test/tracker_exceptions
>
> It's simply due to lack of time to concentrate on
> this as well as doing the more visible parts of
> the IETF Chair job.
>
> This isn't a complaint. But it's reality.
>
>    Brian

_______________________________________________
Pesci-discuss mailing list
Pesci-discuss@ietf.org
https://www1.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/pesci-discuss