Re: [Pesci-discuss] Next Steps: Who performs them?
Harald Tveit Alvestrand <harald@alvestrand.no> Wed, 02 November 2005 00:53 UTC
Received: from localhost.cnri.reston.va.us ([127.0.0.1] helo=megatron.ietf.org)
by megatron.ietf.org with esmtp (Exim 4.32)
id 1EX6sM-00080R-I5; Tue, 01 Nov 2005 19:53:14 -0500
Received: from odin.ietf.org ([132.151.1.176] helo=ietf.org)
by megatron.ietf.org with esmtp (Exim 4.32) id 1EX6sK-0007yx-S2
for pesci-discuss@megatron.ietf.org; Tue, 01 Nov 2005 19:53:12 -0500
Received: from ietf-mx.ietf.org (ietf-mx [132.151.6.1])
by ietf.org (8.9.1a/8.9.1a) with ESMTP id TAA27345
for <pesci-discuss@ietf.org>; Tue, 1 Nov 2005 19:52:51 -0500 (EST)
Received: from eikenes.alvestrand.no ([158.38.152.233])
by ietf-mx.ietf.org with esmtp (Exim 4.43) id 1EX76o-00032W-Bj
for pesci-discuss@ietf.org; Tue, 01 Nov 2005 20:08:11 -0500
Received: from localhost (eikenes.alvestrand.no [127.0.0.1])
by eikenes.alvestrand.no (Postfix) with ESMTP id 823922596C8;
Wed, 2 Nov 2005 01:52:18 +0100 (CET)
Received: from eikenes.alvestrand.no ([127.0.0.1])
by localhost (eikenes.alvestrand.no [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new,
port 10024)
with ESMTP id 12272-03; Wed, 2 Nov 2005 01:52:15 +0100 (CET)
Received: from [192.168.1.160] (163.80-203-220.nextgentel.com [80.203.220.163])
by eikenes.alvestrand.no (Postfix) with ESMTP id 460202596C7;
Wed, 2 Nov 2005 01:52:15 +0100 (CET)
Date: Wed, 02 Nov 2005 01:53:46 +0100
From: Harald Tveit Alvestrand <harald@alvestrand.no>
To: Sam Hartman <hartmans-ietf@mit.edu>
Subject: Re: [Pesci-discuss] Next Steps: Who performs them?
Message-ID: <04AC0FB6C9E4B47C04564C92@svartdal.hjemme.alvestrand.no>
In-Reply-To: <tslacgoc60q.fsf@cz.mit.edu>
References: <tslhdawbe5z.fsf@cz.mit.edu>
<7B02CA4871012A4D8A100A9C@B50854F0A9192E8EC6CDA126>
<tslacgoc60q.fsf@cz.mit.edu>
X-Mailer: Mulberry/3.1.6 (Linux/x86)
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii; format=flowed
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Content-Disposition: inline
X-Virus-Scanned: by amavisd-new at alvestrand.no
X-Spam-Score: 0.0 (/)
X-Scan-Signature: 79899194edc4f33a41f49410777972f8
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Cc: pesci-discuss@ietf.org
X-BeenThere: pesci-discuss@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5
Precedence: list
List-Id: Process Evolution Study Committee of the IETF discussion
<pesci-discuss.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www1.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/pesci-discuss>,
<mailto:pesci-discuss-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://www1.ietf.org/pipermail/pesci-discuss>
List-Post: <mailto:pesci-discuss@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:pesci-discuss-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www1.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/pesci-discuss>,
<mailto:pesci-discuss-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
Sender: pesci-discuss-bounces@ietf.org
Errors-To: pesci-discuss-bounces@ietf.org
--On tirsdag, november 01, 2005 18:17:25 -0500 Sam Hartman <hartmans-ietf@mit.edu> wrote: > if you believe that one team coming up with a synthesis process is a > principle, you can propose that as part of the pesci output. I'll > need to think for a while about whether I think that's really a > principle. > I don't think it's a principle. But neither do I think the inverse (that there should be more than one) is a principle. It's just that I think only one of them is workable. _______________________________________________ Pesci-discuss mailing list Pesci-discuss@ietf.org https://www1.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/pesci-discuss
- [Pesci-discuss] Next Steps: Who performs them? Sam Hartman
- Re: [Pesci-discuss] Next Steps: Who performs them? Harald Tveit Alvestrand
- Re: [Pesci-discuss] Next Steps: Who performs them? Sam Hartman
- Re: [Pesci-discuss] Next Steps: Who performs them? Harald Tveit Alvestrand
- Re: [Pesci-discuss] Next Steps: Who performs them? Sam Hartman