[Pesci-discuss] For whom it may concern..

Pekka Savola <pekkas@netcore.fi> Thu, 10 November 2005 00:55 UTC

Received: from localhost.cnri.reston.va.us ([127.0.0.1] helo=megatron.ietf.org) by megatron.ietf.org with esmtp (Exim 4.32) id 1Ea0is-0005F3-IJ; Wed, 09 Nov 2005 19:55:26 -0500
Received: from odin.ietf.org ([132.151.1.176] helo=ietf.org) by megatron.ietf.org with esmtp (Exim 4.32) id 1Ea0iq-0005Ev-I0 for pesci-discuss@megatron.ietf.org; Wed, 09 Nov 2005 19:55:24 -0500
Received: from ietf-mx.ietf.org (ietf-mx [132.151.6.1]) by ietf.org (8.9.1a/8.9.1a) with ESMTP id TAA22932 for <pesci-discuss@ietf.org>; Wed, 9 Nov 2005 19:54:57 -0500 (EST)
Received: from netcore.fi ([193.94.160.1]) by ietf-mx.ietf.org with esmtp (Exim 4.43) id 1Ea0yw-0008Aj-OF for pesci-discuss@ietf.org; Wed, 09 Nov 2005 20:12:04 -0500
Received: from localhost (pekkas@localhost) by netcore.fi (8.11.6/8.11.6) with ESMTP id jAA0tBU07441 for <pesci-discuss@ietf.org>; Thu, 10 Nov 2005 02:55:11 +0200
Date: Thu, 10 Nov 2005 02:55:11 +0200 (EET)
From: Pekka Savola <pekkas@netcore.fi>
To: pesci-discuss@ietf.org
Message-ID: <Pine.LNX.4.64.0511100249360.7319@netcore.fi>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: TEXT/PLAIN; charset=US-ASCII; format=flowed
X-Spam-Score: 0.0 (/)
X-Scan-Signature: 1ac7cc0a4cd376402b85bc1961a86ac2
Subject: [Pesci-discuss] For whom it may concern..
X-BeenThere: pesci-discuss@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5
Precedence: list
List-Id: Process Evolution Study Committee of the IETF discussion <pesci-discuss.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www1.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/pesci-discuss>, <mailto:pesci-discuss-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://www1.ietf.org/pipermail/pesci-discuss>
List-Post: <mailto:pesci-discuss@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:pesci-discuss-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www1.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/pesci-discuss>, <mailto:pesci-discuss-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
Sender: pesci-discuss-bounces@ietf.org
Errors-To: pesci-discuss-bounces@ietf.org

Dear (parts ofo the) IESG and IAB,

Thanks for overwhelming the PESCI BOF with your concerns.

Wouldn't you rather be part of the solution, or continue being part of 
the problem?

Unless you've noticed, the IETF leadership (that would be you) has not 
exactly been active or successful in solving this problem.  I realize 
John Klensin already stated this at a plenary a year or two ago. 
Maybe you should look at the mirror, and step back a bit when the 
community tries to solve the problem?

Thank you.

_______________________________________________
Pesci-discuss mailing list
Pesci-discuss@ietf.org
https://www1.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/pesci-discuss