[Pesci-discuss] Minutes for PESCI team meeting 5th October 2005

"Adrian Farrel" <adrian@olddog.co.uk> Tue, 11 October 2005 21:56 UTC

Received: from localhost.localdomain ([127.0.0.1] helo=megatron.ietf.org) by megatron.ietf.org with esmtp (Exim 4.32) id 1EPS79-0007JG-Bv; Tue, 11 Oct 2005 17:56:51 -0400
Received: from odin.ietf.org ([132.151.1.176] helo=ietf.org) by megatron.ietf.org with esmtp (Exim 4.32) id 1EPS77-0007Ig-Ei for pesci-discuss@megatron.ietf.org; Tue, 11 Oct 2005 17:56:49 -0400
Received: from ietf-mx.ietf.org (ietf-mx [132.151.6.1]) by ietf.org (8.9.1a/8.9.1a) with ESMTP id RAA06341 for <pesci-discuss@ietf.org>; Tue, 11 Oct 2005 17:56:46 -0400 (EDT)
Received: from astro.systems.pipex.net ([62.241.163.6]) by ietf-mx.ietf.org with esmtp (Exim 4.43) id 1EPSHJ-0002wA-2g for pesci-discuss@ietf.org; Tue, 11 Oct 2005 18:07:21 -0400
Received: from dnni.com (81-178-2-190.dsl.pipex.com [81.178.2.190]) by astro.systems.pipex.net (Postfix) with ESMTP id 2B364E0000B7 for <pesci-discuss@ietf.org>; Tue, 11 Oct 2005 22:56:40 +0100 (BST)
Received: from Puppy ([217.158.132.11] RDNS failed) by dnni.com with Microsoft SMTPSVC(6.0.3790.211); Tue, 11 Oct 2005 22:56:38 +0100
Message-ID: <2a6801c5ceaf$12670ff0$f2849ed9@Puppy>
From: "Adrian Farrel" <adrian@olddog.co.uk>
To: <pesci-discuss@ietf.org>
Date: Tue, 11 Oct 2005 22:59:29 +0100
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="iso-8859-1"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
X-Priority: 3
X-MSMail-Priority: Normal
X-Mailer: Microsoft Outlook Express 6.00.2800.1158
x-mimeole: Produced By Microsoft MimeOLE V6.00.2800.1165
X-OriginalArrivalTime: 11 Oct 2005 21:56:39.0950 (UTC) FILETIME=[A8AD7AE0:01C5CEAE]
X-Spam-Score: 0.1 (/)
X-Scan-Signature: 92df29fa99cf13e554b84c8374345c17
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Subject: [Pesci-discuss] Minutes for PESCI team meeting 5th October 2005
X-BeenThere: pesci-discuss@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5
Precedence: list
Reply-To: Adrian Farrel <adrian@olddog.co.uk>
List-Id: Process Evolution Study Committee of the IETF discussion <pesci-discuss.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www1.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/pesci-discuss>, <mailto:pesci-discuss-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://www1.ietf.org/pipermail/pesci-discuss>
List-Post: <mailto:pesci-discuss@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:pesci-discuss-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www1.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/pesci-discuss>, <mailto:pesci-discuss-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
Sender: pesci-discuss-bounces@ietf.org
Errors-To: pesci-discuss-bounces@ietf.org

Hi folks,
Sorry this is almost a week late. Trying to fit everything into my life.
Cheers,
Adrian
===
PESCI conference call 2pm GMT Wednesday 5th October September 2005
       Harald Alvestrand
       Scott Brim
       Brian Carpenter
       Elwyn Davies
       Adrian Farrel
       Michael Richardson

Agenda for the call:
- Brainstorm on list of guiding principles and goals for inclusion in the
I-D

1. Principles and Goals

* Limited list of sacred cows must be included
  - open process
  - rough consensus
  - running code when we can get it

* All decisions are subject to appeal. A complete complaints, conciliation
  and appeals process should be documented.

* Decision criteria and procedures that support the process should be
  publicly documented.
  - This should include criteria for document quality (distinct from
TechSpec)

* Cycling through leadership positions should be encouraged rather than
  making them a career.
  - Debated the underlying goal.
  - Agreed that discussion of fixed term is not in scope as it is not a
    goal per se.

* Goal with NomCom is to ensure that there is a sufficiently large pool of
  volunteers.
  - Issues of how NomCom work is structured and how much work there is,
    may impact on this, but discussions of fixing this are solutionism.

* Need a method to develop future leaders within the active community
  should be added
  - Problem is that we don't have a large enough pool of candidate leaders
  - Process must include a way for people to be trained

* WGs should be primarily responsible for the quality of their output.
  - An objective is to reduce the number of IESG DISCUSSes
  - Aim for some consistency of I-Ds as they hit the IESG

2. I-D
* Elwyn has taken over editing the I-D. Aim to have a new version for team
  review ASAP.

3. Other Points
* We need to examine each principle that we document to check that it is a
  real principle and not a solution. Where it is a solution, we need to
  dig for the real principle.

* May need to capture the fact that there is distinctiveness about the
  IETF Areas.

4. Next Call
* Next call Wednesday 12th October.

Meeting ended 3pm GMT.




_______________________________________________
Pesci-discuss mailing list
Pesci-discuss@ietf.org
https://www1.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/pesci-discuss