Re: [Pesci-discuss] Face-to-face meetings

Brian E Carpenter <brc@zurich.ibm.com> Fri, 21 October 2005 10:02 UTC

Received: from localhost.localdomain ([127.0.0.1] helo=megatron.ietf.org) by megatron.ietf.org with esmtp (Exim 4.32) id 1EStjd-0000pZ-7I; Fri, 21 Oct 2005 06:02:49 -0400
Received: from odin.ietf.org ([132.151.1.176] helo=ietf.org) by megatron.ietf.org with esmtp (Exim 4.32) id 1EStjb-0000pU-Vy for pesci-discuss@megatron.ietf.org; Fri, 21 Oct 2005 06:02:48 -0400
Received: from ietf-mx.ietf.org (ietf-mx [132.151.6.1]) by ietf.org (8.9.1a/8.9.1a) with ESMTP id GAA11012 for <pesci-discuss@ietf.org>; Fri, 21 Oct 2005 06:02:36 -0400 (EDT)
Received: from mtagate3.uk.ibm.com ([195.212.29.136]) by ietf-mx.ietf.org with esmtp (Exim 4.43) id 1EStvj-0002E4-Eo for pesci-discuss@ietf.org; Fri, 21 Oct 2005 06:15:19 -0400
Received: from d06nrmr1407.portsmouth.uk.ibm.com (d06nrmr1407.portsmouth.uk.ibm.com [9.149.38.185]) by mtagate3.uk.ibm.com (8.12.10/8.12.10) with ESMTP id j9LA2EVw240522 for <pesci-discuss@ietf.org>; Fri, 21 Oct 2005 11:02:17 +0100
Received: from d06av01.portsmouth.uk.ibm.com (d06av01.portsmouth.uk.ibm.com [9.149.37.212]) by d06nrmr1407.portsmouth.uk.ibm.com (8.12.10/NCO/VERS6.7) with ESMTP id j9LA1lOd239934 for <pesci-discuss@ietf.org>; Fri, 21 Oct 2005 11:01:47 +0100
Received: from d06av01.portsmouth.uk.ibm.com (loopback [127.0.0.1]) by d06av01.portsmouth.uk.ibm.com (8.12.11/8.13.3) with ESMTP id j9LA1ktK015907 for <pesci-discuss@ietf.org>; Fri, 21 Oct 2005 11:01:47 +0100
Received: from sihl.zurich.ibm.com (sihl.zurich.ibm.com [9.4.16.232]) by d06av01.portsmouth.uk.ibm.com (8.12.11/8.12.11) with ESMTP id j9LA1k52015887; Fri, 21 Oct 2005 11:01:46 +0100
Received: from zurich.ibm.com (sig-9-145-131-146.de.ibm.com [9.145.131.146]) by sihl.zurich.ibm.com (AIX4.3/8.9.3p2/8.9.3) with ESMTP id MAA49808; Fri, 21 Oct 2005 12:01:45 +0200
Message-ID: <4358BC86.7050007@zurich.ibm.com>
Date: Fri, 21 Oct 2005 12:01:42 +0200
From: Brian E Carpenter <brc@zurich.ibm.com>
Organization: IBM
User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Windows; U; Windows NT 5.1; en-US; rv:1.6) Gecko/20040113
X-Accept-Language: en, fr, de
MIME-Version: 1.0
To: Harald Tveit Alvestrand <harald@alvestrand.no>
Subject: Re: [Pesci-discuss] Face-to-face meetings
References: <0BDFFF51DC89434FA33F8B37FCE363D502882EEB@zcarhxm2.corp.nortel.co m> <43577097.7040503@zurich.ibm.com> <017d01c5d5a5$0a9e8c10$f5087c0a@china.huawei.com> <6.2.0.14.2.20051021082310.02be4958@kahuna.telstra.net> <20051020224356.GA5984@sbrim-wxp01> <43589BF0.20707@piuha.net> <C42099E28B30B2D24B739513@svartdal.hjemme.alvestrand.no>
In-Reply-To: <C42099E28B30B2D24B739513@svartdal.hjemme.alvestrand.no>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii; format=flowed
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
X-Spam-Score: 0.0 (/)
X-Scan-Signature: f4c2cf0bccc868e4cc88dace71fb3f44
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Cc: PESCI Discuss Mailing List <pesci-discuss@ietf.org>, Scott W Brim <sbrim@cisco.com>
X-BeenThere: pesci-discuss@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5
Precedence: list
List-Id: Process Evolution Study Committee of the IETF discussion <pesci-discuss.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www1.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/pesci-discuss>, <mailto:pesci-discuss-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://www1.ietf.org/pipermail/pesci-discuss>
List-Post: <mailto:pesci-discuss@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:pesci-discuss-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www1.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/pesci-discuss>, <mailto:pesci-discuss-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
Sender: pesci-discuss-bounces@ietf.org
Errors-To: pesci-discuss-bounces@ietf.org

So, I read this as saying no change of principle here,
which would mean out of scope for PESCI.

    Brian

Harald Tveit Alvestrand wrote:
> 
> 
> --On fredag, oktober 21, 2005 10:42:40 +0300 Jari Arkko 
> <jari.arkko@piuha.net> wrote:
> 
>> Scott W Brim wrote:
>>
>>> How can we have the focus of the interims and
>>> still have the cross-fertilization?
>>>
>>>
>> Easy. Do both. Its silly to think that 3 x 2 hrs = 6 hrs
>> of face time per year will advance any major piece of
>> technology. In addition, people will need to have
>> design teams, conference calls, interim meetings,
>> private meetings, etc. And obviously work on their
>> drafts and reviews on their own.
> 
> 
> And work on the mailing list, of course.....
> In some ways, I see face-to-face meetings as accelerating the work of 
> the mailing list more than replacing the at-IETF meetings.
> 
>> Having said that, I don't think the focus of the main
>> IETF meeting should be just "reporting to a broader
>> audience" as Geoff put it. I hate status report meetings
>> packed with 10 minute slots of "we updated the draft
>> and here are the issues please continue the discussion
>> on the list". Its true that we do get a broader audience,
>> both within and outside the WG in the IETF main meetings.
>> However, the meeting should still focus on discussion
>> of relevant technical topics, engaging not just
>> the regular key contributors but also others in this
>> discussion.
> 
> 
> Concur. This is very much a chair orientation issue, I think; if the 
> chair insists on running the session as a 5-min-per-draft reporting 
> session, that's how it will be. The chair has the power to decide this - 
> and the chair SHOULD know what the critical issues for the WG are at any 
> given time.
> 
>                      Harald
> 
> 
> 
> _______________________________________________
> Pesci-discuss mailing list
> Pesci-discuss@ietf.org
> https://www1.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/pesci-discuss
> 


_______________________________________________
Pesci-discuss mailing list
Pesci-discuss@ietf.org
https://www1.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/pesci-discuss