Re: [Pesci-discuss] Draft BOF agenda
Scott W Brim <swb@employees.org> Wed, 19 October 2005 11:43 UTC
Received: from localhost.localdomain ([127.0.0.1] helo=megatron.ietf.org)
by megatron.ietf.org with esmtp (Exim 4.32)
id 1ESCLh-0006jH-Mp; Wed, 19 Oct 2005 07:43:13 -0400
Received: from odin.ietf.org ([132.151.1.176] helo=ietf.org)
by megatron.ietf.org with esmtp (Exim 4.32) id 1ESCLd-0006iK-Ih
for pesci-discuss@megatron.ietf.org; Wed, 19 Oct 2005 07:43:11 -0400
Received: from ietf-mx.ietf.org (ietf-mx [132.151.6.1])
by ietf.org (8.9.1a/8.9.1a) with ESMTP id HAA08829
for <pesci-discuss@ietf.org>; Wed, 19 Oct 2005 07:43:00 -0400 (EDT)
Received: from sj-iport-2-in.cisco.com ([171.71.176.71]
helo=sj-iport-2.cisco.com) by ietf-mx.ietf.org with esmtp (Exim 4.43)
id 1ESCXK-0008Vf-Ux
for pesci-discuss@ietf.org; Wed, 19 Oct 2005 07:55:17 -0400
Received: from sj-core-5.cisco.com ([171.71.177.238])
by sj-iport-2.cisco.com with ESMTP; 19 Oct 2005 04:42:58 -0700
Received: from xbh-rtp-211.amer.cisco.com (xbh-rtp-211.cisco.com
[64.102.31.102])
by sj-core-5.cisco.com (8.12.10/8.12.6) with ESMTP id j9JBgj9A025181;
Wed, 19 Oct 2005 04:42:55 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from xfe-rtp-202.amer.cisco.com ([64.102.31.21]) by
xbh-rtp-211.amer.cisco.com with Microsoft SMTPSVC(6.0.3790.211);
Wed, 19 Oct 2005 07:42:48 -0400
Received: from [10.86.240.120] ([10.86.240.120]) by xfe-rtp-202.amer.cisco.com
with Microsoft SMTPSVC(6.0.3790.211);
Wed, 19 Oct 2005 07:42:48 -0400
Message-ID: <43563137.2020802@employees.org>
Date: Wed, 19 Oct 2005 07:42:47 -0400
From: Scott W Brim <swb@employees.org>
User-Agent: Mozilla Thunderbird 1.0.6 (Windows/20050716)
X-Accept-Language: en-us, en
MIME-Version: 1.0
To: Sam Hartman <hartmans-ietf@mit.edu>
Subject: Re: [Pesci-discuss] Draft BOF agenda
References: <4355FE38.4070101@zurich.ibm.com> <tsloe5lrfxn.fsf@cz.mit.edu>
In-Reply-To: <tsloe5lrfxn.fsf@cz.mit.edu>
X-Enigmail-Version: 0.93.0.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
X-OriginalArrivalTime: 19 Oct 2005 11:42:48.0568 (UTC)
FILETIME=[3AC49780:01C5D4A2]
X-Spam-Score: 0.0 (/)
X-Scan-Signature: 1ac7cc0a4cd376402b85bc1961a86ac2
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Cc: pesci-discuss@ietf.org
X-BeenThere: pesci-discuss@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5
Precedence: list
List-Id: Process Evolution Study Committee of the IETF discussion
<pesci-discuss.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www1.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/pesci-discuss>,
<mailto:pesci-discuss-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://www1.ietf.org/pipermail/pesci-discuss>
List-Post: <mailto:pesci-discuss@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:pesci-discuss-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www1.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/pesci-discuss>,
<mailto:pesci-discuss-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
Sender: pesci-discuss-bounces@ietf.org
Errors-To: pesci-discuss-bounces@ietf.org
On 10/19/2005 05:53 AM, Sam Hartman allegedly wrote: > My inclination is to focus the BOF discussion on principles for > process change and on next steps and to hold the general principles > discussion on the list, in the plenary and probably later on the ietf > list. However I'm open to other proposals for maintaining bof focus > and for addressing my concerns of the previous paragraph. > > Regardless, I would recommend separating the principles discussion on > the agenda. Please consider discussing the process change principles > (4.1, 4.2.1 and 4.2.2) separatly from the more general principles > (4.2.3 through 4.2.7). You may consider 4.1.1 to be part of the more > general principles. This sounds good to me. _______________________________________________ Pesci-discuss mailing list Pesci-discuss@ietf.org https://www1.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/pesci-discuss
- [Pesci-discuss] Draft BOF agenda Brian E Carpenter
- Re: [Pesci-discuss] Draft BOF agenda Sam Hartman
- Re: [Pesci-discuss] Draft BOF agenda Scott W Brim
- Re: [Pesci-discuss] Draft BOF agenda Brian E Carpenter