Re: [Pesci-discuss] stack overflow

Dave Crocker <dcrocker@bbiw.net> Sun, 30 October 2005 15:02 UTC

Received: from localhost.cnri.reston.va.us ([127.0.0.1] helo=megatron.ietf.org) by megatron.ietf.org with esmtp (Exim 4.32) id 1EWEhP-0001Qd-UL; Sun, 30 Oct 2005 10:02:19 -0500
Received: from odin.ietf.org ([132.151.1.176] helo=ietf.org) by megatron.ietf.org with esmtp (Exim 4.32) id 1EVWVV-00027P-FW for pesci-discuss@megatron.ietf.org; Fri, 28 Oct 2005 11:51:08 -0400
Received: from ietf-mx.ietf.org (ietf-mx [132.151.6.1]) by ietf.org (8.9.1a/8.9.1a) with ESMTP id LAA25751 for <pesci-discuss@ietf.org>; Fri, 28 Oct 2005 11:50:48 -0400 (EDT)
Received: from sb7.songbird.com ([208.184.79.137]) by ietf-mx.ietf.org with esmtp (Exim 4.43) id 1EVWj3-0001dW-47 for pesci-discuss@ietf.org; Fri, 28 Oct 2005 12:05:08 -0400
Received: from [192.168.0.7] (adsl-67-127-235-35.dsl.irvnca.pacbell.net [67.127.235.35]) (authenticated bits=0) by sb7.songbird.com (8.12.11/8.12.11) with ESMTP id j9SFpUYC017553 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=DHE-RSA-AES256-SHA bits=256 verify=NO); Fri, 28 Oct 2005 08:51:31 -0700
Message-ID: <436248D6.1080807@bbiw.net>
Date: Fri, 28 Oct 2005 08:50:46 -0700
From: Dave Crocker <dcrocker@bbiw.net>
Organization: Brandenburg InternetWorking
User-Agent: Thunderbird 1.4 (Windows/20050908)
MIME-Version: 1.0
To: Brian E Carpenter <brc@zurich.ibm.com>
Subject: Re: [Pesci-discuss] stack overflow
References: <BF841A6B.2DCA%mshore@cisco.com> <4360E562.1050200@zurich.ibm.com> <435E9CBA.5000905@dcrocker.net> <BF841A6B.2DCA%mshore@cisco.com> <6.2.3.4.2.20051026014448.0493dd80@mail.jefsey.com> <435E9CBA.5000905@dcrocker.net> <BF841A6B.2DCA%mshore@cisco.com> <20051027152513.GD1704@sbrim-wxp01> <43616CF6.6010100@dcrocker.net> <43620CA9.8060602@zurich.ibm.com>
In-Reply-To: <43620CA9.8060602@zurich.ibm.com>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
X-SongbirdInformation: support@songbird.com for more information
X-Songbird: Found to be clean
X-Songbird-From: dcrocker@bbiw.net
X-Spam-Score: 0.1 (/)
X-Scan-Signature: 08170828343bcf1325e4a0fb4584481c
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
X-Mailman-Approved-At: Sun, 30 Oct 2005 10:02:17 -0500
Cc: pesci-discuss@ietf.org
X-BeenThere: pesci-discuss@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5
Precedence: list
List-Id: Process Evolution Study Committee of the IETF discussion <pesci-discuss.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www1.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/pesci-discuss>, <mailto:pesci-discuss-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://www1.ietf.org/pipermail/pesci-discuss>
List-Post: <mailto:pesci-discuss@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:pesci-discuss-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www1.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/pesci-discuss>, <mailto:pesci-discuss-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
Sender: pesci-discuss-bounces@ietf.org
Errors-To: pesci-discuss-bounces@ietf.org



>> 2. Death by a thousand criticisms, rather than a collaborative tone to 
>> improve it.
> 
> There's obviously something wrong here, because I violently agree
> with your last sentence. 

Don't worry.  It probably doesn't mean anything significant.

It's one of those characteristics of statistics.  If I say enough (randomly) 
different things, eventually you will agree with one of them...

d/

_______________________________________________
Pesci-discuss mailing list
Pesci-discuss@ietf.org
https://www1.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/pesci-discuss