IETF Logo Mail Archive

Re: [Pesci-discuss] Next Steps: Who performs them?

Sam Hartman <hartmans-ietf-ietf@mit.edu> Wed, 02 November 2005 21:52 UTC

Received: from localhost.cnri.reston.va.us ([127.0.0.1] helo=megatron.ietf.org) by megatron.ietf.org with esmtp (Exim 4.32) id 1EXQWu-0000A1-Re; Wed, 02 Nov 2005 16:52:24 -0500
Received: from odin.ietf.org ([132.151.1.176] helo=ietf.org) by megatron.ietf.org with esmtp (Exim 4.32) id 1EXPrE-000665-0x for pesci-discuss@megatron.ietf.org; Wed, 02 Nov 2005 16:09:20 -0500
Received: from ietf-mx.ietf.org (ietf-mx [132.151.6.1]) by ietf.org (8.9.1a/8.9.1a) with ESMTP id QAA08093 for <pesci-discuss@ietf.org>; Wed, 2 Nov 2005 16:08:59 -0500 (EST)
Received: from carter-zimmerman.suchdamage.org ([69.25.196.178] helo=carter-zimmerman.mit.edu) by ietf-mx.ietf.org with esmtp (Exim 4.43) id 1EXQ5s-0006h5-7Y for pesci-discuss@ietf.org; Wed, 02 Nov 2005 16:24:29 -0500
Received: by carter-zimmerman.mit.edu (Postfix, from userid 8042) id D7B23E006D; Wed, 2 Nov 2005 16:09:11 -0500 (EST)
To: Harald Tveit Alvestrand <harald@alvestrand.no>
Subject: Re: [Pesci-discuss] Next Steps: Who performs them?
References: <tslhdawbe5z.fsf@cz.mit.edu> <7B02CA4871012A4D8A100A9C@B50854F0A9192E8EC6CDA126> <tslacgoc60q.fsf@cz.mit.edu> <04AC0FB6C9E4B47C04564C92@svartdal.hjemme.alvestrand.no>
From: Sam Hartman <hartmans-ietf-ietf@mit.edu>
Date: Wed, 02 Nov 2005 16:09:11 -0500
In-Reply-To: <04AC0FB6C9E4B47C04564C92@svartdal.hjemme.alvestrand.no> (Harald Tveit Alvestrand's message of "Wed, 02 Nov 2005 01:53:46 +0100")
Message-ID: <tsloe52n4eg.fsf@cz.mit.edu>
User-Agent: Gnus/5.1006 (Gnus v5.10.6) Emacs/21.3 (gnu/linux)
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
X-Spam-Score: 0.0 (/)
X-Scan-Signature: 7655788c23eb79e336f5f8ba8bce7906
X-Mailman-Approved-At: Wed, 02 Nov 2005 16:52:22 -0500
Cc: pesci-discuss@ietf.org
X-BeenThere: pesci-discuss@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5
Precedence: list
List-Id: Process Evolution Study Committee of the IETF discussion <pesci-discuss.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www1.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/pesci-discuss>, <mailto:pesci-discuss-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://www1.ietf.org/pipermail/pesci-discuss>
List-Post: <mailto:pesci-discuss@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:pesci-discuss-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www1.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/pesci-discuss>, <mailto:pesci-discuss-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
Sender: pesci-discuss-bounces@ietf.org
Errors-To: pesci-discuss-bounces@ietf.org

>>>>> "Harald" == Harald Tveit Alvestrand <harald@alvestrand.no> writes:

    Harald> --On tirsdag, november 01, 2005 18:17:25 -0500 Sam Hartman
    Harald> <hartmans-ietf@mit.edu> wrote:

    >> if you believe that one team coming up with a synthesis process
    >> is a principle, you can propose that as part of the pesci
    >> output.  I'll need to think for a while about whether I think
    >> that's really a principle.
    >> 

    Harald> I don't think it's a principle. But neither do I think the
    Harald> inverse (that there should be more than one) is a
    Harald> principle.


I've been thinking more about this.  I don't think a synthesis team is
a principle, but I do think unity/coherence of resulting process is a
principle.

I think something like it is  stated already; I need to reread the
draft before the bof.


_______________________________________________
Pesci-discuss mailing list
Pesci-discuss@ietf.org
https://www1.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/pesci-discuss

v2.8.7 | Report a Bug | By Email