[Pesci-discuss] "ADs are the central focus of technical expertise"

Scott, et al,

>>   Areas have become a fundamental structuring mechanism for IETF work
>>   since the Kobe reorganization.  Area Directors (ADs) are at the
>>   moment the central focus of management and technical expertise in the
>>   IETF.
>>     
> ...
> (2) I do believe ADs are the central focus of technical expertise.
> Maybe they don't have it in the specialties, but it all comes together
> at the ADs at this time.
>   

I suggest that the truth and implications of this view be 
(re-)considered very carefully. 

It seems to be a fundamental and commonly-held view, but I suspect that 
a great deal of the IETF's problems come from our citing it too 
casually.  ADs are certainly chosen for presumed and/or demonstrated 
technical expertise, but that is a very different statement than Scott 
made.  And I suspect Scott's statement reflects the typical community view.

Here is the dilemma:

1. ADs essentially never initiate a working group activity; other folks 
in the community do.  So the perception of community need comes from the 
community and the effort to pursue that need comes from the community.

2. Technical drafts that are input to new working groups do not come 
from the cognizant Area Director.  Technical drafts that are produced by 
a WG do not come from the cognizant AD.

3. The cognizant AD is not supposed to do any of the principal work -- 
and on the average they do essentially none of the actual work -- in 
creating a specification, because then they would have a conflict of 
interest in any evaluation of the work.

So, the people we are saying "are the central focus of technical 
expertise" for the IETF do not typically initiate the technical work or 
do the technical work, when they are the cognizant AD. 

So what does it mean to say that they are the central focus?

d/

_______________________________________________
Pesci-discuss mailing list
Pesci-discuss@ietf.org
https://www1.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/pesci-discuss