[Pesci-discuss] Re: PESCI, WGs and the consensus process

And so my question:  why is this different for PESCI?

(Why) is it not applicable for MARID?

And, if you see a distinction, come back and make sure the
PESCI list doesn't fall into being treated as, or thinking
it is, a WG.

Harald Tveit Alvestrand wrote:
> A point that distinguished the success from the failure above seems to 
> be the requirement that one needs to find *consensus* within the smaller 
> mailing list. A design team can say "we have received input, some of 
> which is reflected here, some of which we disagree with" - and go 
> straight to the whole IETF and ask for their consensus (either ask for 
> consensus that the solutoin is right, or ask for consensus that the IETF 
> should consent to letting the stuff go ahead - these are subtly 
> different.....)

Leslie.

_______________________________________________
Pesci-discuss mailing list
Pesci-discuss@ietf.org
https://www1.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/pesci-discuss