IETF Logo Mail Archive

Re: Decision process [Re: [Pesci-discuss] stack overflow]

Melinda Shore <mshore@cisco.com> Thu, 27 October 2005 15:53 UTC

Received: from localhost.localdomain ([127.0.0.1] helo=megatron.ietf.org) by megatron.ietf.org with esmtp (Exim 4.32) id 1EVA4H-0006tO-MN; Thu, 27 Oct 2005 11:53:29 -0400
Received: from odin.ietf.org ([132.151.1.176] helo=ietf.org) by megatron.ietf.org with esmtp (Exim 4.32) id 1EVA4D-0006rq-TI for pesci-discuss@megatron.ietf.org; Thu, 27 Oct 2005 11:53:28 -0400
Received: from ietf-mx.ietf.org (ietf-mx [132.151.6.1]) by ietf.org (8.9.1a/8.9.1a) with ESMTP id LAA29175 for <pesci-discuss@ietf.org>; Thu, 27 Oct 2005 11:53:09 -0400 (EDT)
Received: from rtp-iport-2.cisco.com ([64.102.122.149]) by ietf-mx.ietf.org with esmtp (Exim 4.43) id 1EVAHa-0005hy-UH for pesci-discuss@ietf.org; Thu, 27 Oct 2005 12:07:16 -0400
Received: from rtp-core-2.cisco.com ([64.102.124.13]) by rtp-iport-2.cisco.com with ESMTP; 27 Oct 2005 11:53:15 -0400
X-IronPort-AV: i="3.97,259,1125892800"; d="scan'208"; a="74559225:sNHT24942476"
Received: from xbh-rtp-201.amer.cisco.com (xbh-rtp-201.cisco.com [64.102.31.12]) by rtp-core-2.cisco.com (8.12.10/8.12.6) with ESMTP id j9RFqmF0001025; Thu, 27 Oct 2005 11:53:13 -0400 (EDT)
Received: from xmb-rtp-205.amer.cisco.com ([64.102.31.59]) by xbh-rtp-201.amer.cisco.com with Microsoft SMTPSVC(6.0.3790.211); Thu, 27 Oct 2005 11:53:09 -0400
Received: from 10.21.96.247 ([10.21.96.247]) by xmb-rtp-205.amer.cisco.com ([64.102.31.59]) via Exchange Front-End Server email.cisco.com ([171.70.151.187]) with Microsoft Exchange Server HTTP-DAV ; Thu, 27 Oct 2005 15:53:08 +0000
User-Agent: Microsoft-Entourage/11.1.0.040913
Date: Thu, 27 Oct 2005 11:53:06 -0400
Subject: Re: Decision process [Re: [Pesci-discuss] stack overflow]
From: Melinda Shore <mshore@cisco.com>
To: Brian E Carpenter <brc@zurich.ibm.com>
Message-ID: <BF867022.2FCF%mshore@cisco.com>
In-Reply-To: <4360E562.1050200@zurich.ibm.com>
Mime-version: 1.0
Content-type: text/plain; charset="US-ASCII"
Content-transfer-encoding: 7bit
X-OriginalArrivalTime: 27 Oct 2005 15:53:09.0207 (UTC) FILETIME=[87123670:01C5DB0E]
X-Spam-Score: 0.0 (/)
X-Scan-Signature: 1ac7cc0a4cd376402b85bc1961a86ac2
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Cc: pesci-discuss@ietf.org
X-BeenThere: pesci-discuss@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5
Precedence: list
List-Id: Process Evolution Study Committee of the IETF discussion <pesci-discuss.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www1.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/pesci-discuss>, <mailto:pesci-discuss-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://www1.ietf.org/pipermail/pesci-discuss>
List-Post: <mailto:pesci-discuss@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:pesci-discuss-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www1.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/pesci-discuss>, <mailto:pesci-discuss-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
Sender: pesci-discuss-bounces@ietf.org
Errors-To: pesci-discuss-bounces@ietf.org

On 10/27/05 10:34 AM, "Brian E Carpenter" <brc@zurich.ibm.com> wrote:
> The PESCI team tended to consider this as one of the things
> we couldn't consider changing, and therefore there's nothing in
> section 4 suggesting any change in this area. Are you arguing for
> a change, and in that case can you offer a draft principle?

I'd be happy to try, although making changes to the decision-making
process tends to imply changes to the "membership" model as well,
and I'm chary of going anywhere near that.  But it's worth a taking
a look at what might be good base principles for decision-making
in the IETF, and perhaps just see where that goes in terms of the
rest of it.

Melinda

_______________________________________________
Pesci-discuss mailing list
Pesci-discuss@ietf.org
https://www1.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/pesci-discuss

v2.8.7 | Report a Bug | By Email