IETF Logo Mail Archive

Re: [Pidloc] draft-nordmark-id-loc-privacy

Luigi Iannone <ggx@gigix.net> Thu, 11 October 2018 08:56 UTC

Return-Path: <ggx@gigix.net>
X-Original-To: pidloc@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: pidloc@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 24703130DE2 for <pidloc@ietfa.amsl.com>; Thu, 11 Oct 2018 01:56:02 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -1.899
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-1.899 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, HTML_MESSAGE=0.001, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_NONE=-0.0001, SPF_PASS=-0.001, URIBL_BLOCKED=0.001] autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no
Authentication-Results: ietfa.amsl.com (amavisd-new); dkim=pass (2048-bit key) header.d=gigix-net.20150623.gappssmtp.com
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id xuEVnnQTTRxN for <pidloc@ietfa.amsl.com>; Thu, 11 Oct 2018 01:55:59 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from mail-wm1-x32e.google.com (mail-wm1-x32e.google.com [IPv6:2a00:1450:4864:20::32e]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES128-GCM-SHA256 (128/128 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 38E63130DD0 for <pidloc@ietf.org>; Thu, 11 Oct 2018 01:55:59 -0700 (PDT)
Received: by mail-wm1-x32e.google.com with SMTP id 143-v6so8090959wmf.1 for <pidloc@ietf.org>; Thu, 11 Oct 2018 01:55:59 -0700 (PDT)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gigix-net.20150623.gappssmtp.com; s=20150623; h=from:message-id:mime-version:subject:date:in-reply-to:cc:to :references; bh=7MfZpzUzHCBX6TxQMypCy/cGOOvPzbTpXFpCJFRK1TQ=; b=NUaDQRT8QuV/juaa37LpYjLUUYReitt565Gmh61yAM9VHE79FwJRJJBX/qrOg/Hikq hPHduDyzdxWwtUFMzIAa7pWK3zcBP79u3g/YEnnibyypMEoVreopY+y/HcrENgL/ZCkY n53ESIOX+fY5lAruvqmJg3gBkuK31vV1jbN/raM9nmH+cG64Tuj2W19j7KyKkxN9ezBM 2mI7tWJzgAJdGEmWVd8xoaCBfhDxccs22lXc1k7bQz12oFoHxtRoTQYOjHzbSU7NpTAB iOck5iDp4gJfZ2anSO2mNupvd0kViKA0qHvdbSq01N6sgTLPNriHmxyUsuKC1IGzZZQo Vd4A==
X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20161025; h=x-gm-message-state:from:message-id:mime-version:subject:date :in-reply-to:cc:to:references; bh=7MfZpzUzHCBX6TxQMypCy/cGOOvPzbTpXFpCJFRK1TQ=; b=emJAPp4RIiAWMkulX4DNhO1WneLj7nklrkOg7nr4vDt2j0+Essd0GiPEfbSPtjRYHx 0vBMFqXo4JfebNc2dsv47mGSn+WkE7mYkFNF1sAwARCzJ+wt4J6q/X3rEP8pp4YeoPWN BUHRWMrDpC38E2wqPw5b3G6alalHo/k31t6XAAkGxUjdItQdlVarh9NTcQ7ym1JJNcfg uw+uhfCF/IkBHn/mmcR+E3T5mEgcrYN4dR4vD5cfg5687/zF/+ta42Y2eGbs6a8xTe/D wyqDXN+p6EbYFhOc3hitE2WCWue8Ptj2odJmGYoJRBQt+yXtkZFTtUmRx+6SeM+alF9b 6RvA==
X-Gm-Message-State: ABuFfogysPdLFj0k/ARrk4fYn5slYTNZuqARENqGXCNJ4Jx2/FxflLGw xIWBObVEcPr3CC7keahNNd1DmcpgfrtYSobB
X-Google-Smtp-Source: ACcGV63yFWSx5Oh1Pyzj/i8eOFW9jlUc3U4gYCzocGXyT1/EpS8sCp33zbzZPflamKVo9GVEUp+9xA==
X-Received: by 2002:a1c:bce:: with SMTP id 197-v6mr828652wml.15.1539248157513; Thu, 11 Oct 2018 01:55:57 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from ?IPv6:2001:660:330f:a4:7489:ccd2:f7c:1d15? ([2001:660:330f:a4:7489:ccd2:f7c:1d15]) by smtp.gmail.com with ESMTPSA id g76-v6sm20485525wmd.25.2018.10.11.01.55.54 (version=TLS1_2 cipher=ECDHE-RSA-AES128-GCM-SHA256 bits=128/128); Thu, 11 Oct 2018 01:55:55 -0700 (PDT)
From: Luigi Iannone <ggx@gigix.net>
Message-Id: <86F15094-3382-4D4F-AD45-C751117C3066@gigix.net>
Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary="Apple-Mail=_AE64319D-20D7-402E-A321-4A1E56F4ED6C"
Mime-Version: 1.0 (Mac OS X Mail 12.0 \(3445.100.39\))
Date: Thu, 11 Oct 2018 10:55:59 +0200
In-Reply-To: <CAC8QAcf-w6QhFXAf9c2y69-aWjwoLWJvuPP0Wgp4iT=Qz9+6tQ@mail.gmail.com>
Cc: pidloc@ietf.org
To: Behcet Sarikaya <sarikaya@ieee.org>
References: <CAC8QAcf-w6QhFXAf9c2y69-aWjwoLWJvuPP0Wgp4iT=Qz9+6tQ@mail.gmail.com>
X-Mailer: Apple Mail (2.3445.100.39)
Archived-At: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/pidloc/2mdl7VTJgWRGGR41gvl5MweX4ug>
Subject: Re: [Pidloc] draft-nordmark-id-loc-privacy
X-BeenThere: pidloc@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29
Precedence: list
List-Id: <pidloc.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/pidloc>, <mailto:pidloc-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/pidloc/>
List-Post: <mailto:pidloc@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:pidloc-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/pidloc>, <mailto:pidloc-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 11 Oct 2018 08:56:02 -0000

Hi,

> On 4 Oct 2018, at 17:02, Behcet Sarikaya <sarikaya2012@gmail.com> wrote:
> 
[snip]

> 
> In Section 6, the draft points to some possibilities on how this limiting can be achieved:
> 
> 1. pointing a locator for some fixed anchor point, like PGW or UPF

This would be kind of a home agent, right?
In this case ww will end up with possibly a long stretch in the path (depending on mobility).



> 2. injecting routing prefixes for the ID prefixes into the normal routing system
> 

LISP has this approach described in RFC 6832.

I think it is not completely disjoint from the previous point. The proxies will become a “fixed anchor point”.

Or you had something else in mind? 

> 3.  not providing any stable locators across this boundary; only allow ephemeral IP addresses per session or otherwise limited exposure.

When you say “ephemeral IP addresses” you mean the RLOCs or the IDs?

Ciao

L.


> 
> In short, the draft is coming up with a lot work to do.
> We suggest that the group takes a close look into all these points and see what we can do :-)
> Regards,
> Behcet & Dirk
> -- 
> Pidloc mailing list
> Pidloc@ietf.org
> https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/pidloc

v2.23.0 | Report a Bug | By Email