Re: [Pidloc] Next Generation IoT authentication
Alexandre Petrescu <alexandre.petrescu@gmail.com> Mon, 04 October 2021 08:54 UTC
Return-Path: <alexandre.petrescu@gmail.com>
X-Original-To: pidloc@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: pidloc@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 4BFD83A12D4 for <pidloc@ietfa.amsl.com>; Mon, 4 Oct 2021 01:54:32 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: 0.668
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=0.668 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, DKIM_ADSP_CUSTOM_MED=0.001, FORGED_GMAIL_RCVD=1, FREEMAIL_FROM=0.001, HTML_MESSAGE=0.001, NICE_REPLY_A=-0.001, NML_ADSP_CUSTOM_MED=0.9, RCVD_IN_MSPIKE_H2=-0.001, SPF_HELO_NONE=0.001, SPF_SOFTFAIL=0.665, URIBL_BLOCKED=0.001] autolearn=no autolearn_force=no
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id yCWem73FQaSQ for <pidloc@ietfa.amsl.com>; Mon, 4 Oct 2021 01:54:27 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from sainfoin-smtp-out.extra.cea.fr (sainfoin-smtp-out.extra.cea.fr [132.167.192.228]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 774043A12C5 for <pidloc@ietf.org>; Mon, 4 Oct 2021 01:54:27 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from pisaure.intra.cea.fr (pisaure.intra.cea.fr [132.166.88.21]) by sainfoin-sys.extra.cea.fr (8.14.7/8.14.7/CEAnet-Internet-out-4.0) with ESMTP id 1948sOLn001733 for <pidloc@ietf.org>; Mon, 4 Oct 2021 10:54:24 +0200
Received: from pisaure.intra.cea.fr (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by localhost (Postfix) with SMTP id 3004C20577C for <pidloc@ietf.org>; Mon, 4 Oct 2021 10:54:24 +0200 (CEST)
Received: from muguet1-smtp-out.intra.cea.fr (muguet1-smtp-out.intra.cea.fr [132.166.192.12]) by pisaure.intra.cea.fr (Postfix) with ESMTP id 24B402051BD for <pidloc@ietf.org>; Mon, 4 Oct 2021 10:54:24 +0200 (CEST)
Received: from [10.8.35.150] (is154594.intra.cea.fr [10.8.35.150]) by muguet1-sys.intra.cea.fr (8.14.7/8.14.7/CEAnet-Internet-out-4.0) with ESMTP id 1948sO6u012507 for <pidloc@ietf.org>; Mon, 4 Oct 2021 10:54:24 +0200
To: pidloc@ietf.org
References: <FR0P281MB0527550B3547197CC3699E0CD1AE9@FR0P281MB0527.DEUP281.PROD.OUTLOOK.COM> <3ac5144b-ca42-9d3f-d85d-1fca03af9dd4@gmail.com>
From: Alexandre Petrescu <alexandre.petrescu@gmail.com>
Message-ID: <c70e99f0-b5c1-45cd-2b42-4701f47cdf25@gmail.com>
Date: Mon, 04 Oct 2021 10:54:25 +0200
User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Windows NT 10.0; Win64; x64; rv:78.0) Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/78.14.0
MIME-Version: 1.0
In-Reply-To: <3ac5144b-ca42-9d3f-d85d-1fca03af9dd4@gmail.com>
Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary="------------D659CDF4B5FC4A3E960DDB61"
Content-Language: fr
Archived-At: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/pidloc/EojIt7q_tuV_u2GZWMfG5HnIjSI>
Subject: Re: [Pidloc] Next Generation IoT authentication
X-BeenThere: pidloc@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29
Precedence: list
List-Id: ssues in hardware based Internet of Things authentication <pidloc.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/pidloc>, <mailto:pidloc-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/pidloc/>
List-Post: <mailto:pidloc@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:pidloc-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/pidloc>, <mailto:pidloc-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 04 Oct 2021 08:54:33 -0000
sorry, I just found out that there exist smoke detectors on 4G... sorry. Alex Le 04/10/2021 à 10:44, Alexandre Petrescu a écrit : > > Hi,Dirk, > > It is not clear to me whether this looks at: > > - user authentication in systems beyond 5G ? > > - authentication for IoT devices on 5G or on WiFi? > > - multiple factor and multiple device authentication in the recent > Internet? (PC+smartphone at payment time, mandated by banks in Europem > recently). > > Le 04/10/2021 à 10:25, Dirk.von-Hugo@telekom.de a écrit : >> >> Dear all, >> >> as posted already last week on 6GIP ML we would like to discuss >> issues with authentication of IoT devices in future (e.g., beyond 5G) >> heterogeneous access networks as part of the need for new >> authentication models. We want to announce that the list description >> at https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/pidloc >> <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/pidloc> has been changed >> accordingly in order to better align with the most recent issues of >> interest on such user-independent authentication. >> >> You may also find some use cases here: >> https://futurenetworks.ieee.org/images/files/pdf/Webinars/2021_FNI_WiFi_6G.pdf >> <https://futurenetworks.ieee.org/images/files/pdf/Webinars/2021_FNI_WiFi_6G.pdf> >> (as, e.g., mentioned on slide 37) >> > > The slide is wrong. > > DEspite the usually accepted concept of a smoke detector connected on > 5G (or 4G), there is no such thing. Smoke detectors have strong > requirements on radio reachability, battery life and their operational > cheking periodicity. 4G/5G are way out of these specs. What can > there be are smoke detectors on WiFi or on Ethernet. At that point > the 4G/5G drop out of the picture. > > Alex > > >> We are looking forward to your comments and ideas! >> >> Thanks! >> >> Best Regards >> Behcet & Dirk >> >> >
- [Pidloc] Next Generation IoT authentication Dirk.von-Hugo
- Re: [Pidloc] Next Generation IoT authentication Alexandre Petrescu
- Re: [Pidloc] Next Generation IoT authentication Alexandre Petrescu
- Re: [Pidloc] Next Generation IoT authentication Dirk.von-Hugo