IETF Logo Mail Archive

Re: Proposed WG: SSH, Secure Shell (SECSH)

Robert Elz <kre@munnari.oz.au> Sat, 15 February 1997 06:55 UTC

Received: from cnri by ietf.org id aa01228; 15 Feb 97 1:55 EST
Received: from ietf.org by CNRI.Reston.VA.US id aa10914; 15 Feb 97 1:55 EST
Received: from ietf.org by ietf.org id aa01125; 15 Feb 97 1:48 EST
Received: from munnari.OZ.AU by ietf.org id aa01120; 15 Feb 97 1:47 EST
Received: from mundamutti.cs.mu.OZ.AU by munnari.OZ.AU with SMTP (5.83--+1.3.1+0.56) id GA07935; Sat, 15 Feb 1997 17:44:59 +1100 (from kre@munnari.OZ.AU)
To: perry@piermont.com
Cc: The IESG <iesg@ietf.org>, The Internet Architecture Board <iab@ietf.org>, ylo@ssh.fi
Subject: Re: Proposed WG: SSH, Secure Shell (SECSH)
In-Reply-To: Your message of "Fri, 14 Feb 1997 09:50:29 CDT." <199702141450.JAA07066@jekyll.piermont.com>
Date: Sat, 15 Feb 1997 17:44:58 +1100
Message-Id: <23532.855989098@munnari.OZ.AU>
Sender: iesg-request@ietf.org
From: Robert Elz <kre@munnari.oz.au>

    Date:        Fri, 14 Feb 1997 09:50:29 -0500
    From:        "Perry E. Metzger" <perry@piermont.com>
    Message-ID:  <199702141450.JAA07066@jekyll.piermont.com>

    The real issue is deciding if we can put SSH on top of the TLS group's
    work so as to prevent protocol multiplication.

Ah, OK, I'd kind of prefer if that were made a little more
explicit.
    
    I have to say I'm not entirely comfortable with the wording of some of
    our milestones -- we know what they mean, but...

yes, well, part of the reason for this charter review is so the
charter can be made understandable to those who are not part of
the in group (lke me).

kre

v2.8.7 | Report a Bug | By Email