Re: Tired of Waiting
"Christopher Ambler" <cambler@iodesign.com> Thu, 16 July 1998 18:50 UTC
Delivery-Date: Thu, 16 Jul 1998 15:01:27 -0400
Return-Path: cclark
Received: (from adm@localhost) by ietf.org (8.8.5/8.8.7a) id OAA19862 for ietf-outbound.10@ietf.org; Thu, 16 Jul 1998 14:50:02 -0400 (EDT)
Received: from mailsvr1.iodesign.com (mailsvr1.iodesign.com [206.190.80.251]) by ietf.org (8.8.5/8.8.7a) with ESMTP id OAA19208 for <ietf@ietf.org>; Thu, 16 Jul 1998 14:12:39 -0400 (EDT)
Received: from tentacle (tide77.microsoft.com [131.107.3.77]) by mailsvr1.iodesign.com with SMTP (Microsoft Exchange Internet Mail Service Version 5.5.1960.3) id NF0FMJL7; Thu, 16 Jul 1998 11:15:11 -0700
Message-ID: <000501bdb0e5$3a7b4b40$d7fd3b9d@tentacle.dns.microsoft.com>
Reply-To: Christopher Ambler <cambler@iodesign.com>
From: Christopher Ambler <cambler@iodesign.com>
To: perry@piermont.com, "Richard J. Sexton" <richard@sexton.com>
Cc: List@giaw.org, ietf@ietf.org, discussion-draft@giaw.org, domain-policy@open-rsc.org
Subject: Re: Tired of Waiting
Date: Thu, 16 Jul 1998 11:12:00 -0700
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="iso-8859-1"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
X-Priority: 3
X-MSMail-Priority: Normal
X-Mailer: Microsoft Outlook Express 4.72.3110.5
X-MimeOLE: Produced By Microsoft MimeOLE V4.72.3110.3
>> Why doesnt CORE just use IOD instead of emergent? > >IOD didn't bid on the contract. Emergent bid on the contract. Exactly. CORE is using Emergent. IOD is using IOD, the company chose to do it themselves. >The central locking database maintained by CORE is just that -- a >database. It is not a business. It isn't set up to take payments, make >payments, handle incoming orders, handle phone support or phone calls, >or any of the other things that would make it a business. It is just >an organization that maintains an Oracle database in a closet. The >registrars are not "middle men". They are doing virtually all of the >actual work. > >The only thing the CORE database does is make sure that they don't >step on each other's feet and provide a central source for the DNS >information to be generated from. A fine system, to be sure. For that matter, if, as expected, the mandate is that registries and registrars must separate themselves, it's entirely logical that IOD would remove the registrar functions and become, strictly, a registry. At that point, the $35 fee could very well drop dramatically. Right now, IOD is set up as registry AND registrar. Some work has been done, I'm told, to get those ready to be separated if need be. This is one of a few reasons why the previous price comparison was somewhat presumptive. -- Christopher Ambler, Personal Opinion Only -- NOTICE: The user of this email address is a resident of the State of Washington. Washington law provides for up to $500 per incident in the case of Unsolicited Commercial Email (also known as spam). This individual WILL file a complaint.
- Re: Tired of Waiting Noel Chiappa
- Re: Tired of Waiting Christopher Ambler
- Re: Tired of Waiting nicnic
- Re: Tired of Waiting Robert Shaw
- Re: Tired of Waiting Christopher Ambler
- Re: Tired of Waiting Simon Higgs
- Re: Tired of Waiting Roeland M.J. Meyer
- Re: Tired of Waiting Roeland M.J. Meyer
- Re: Tired of Waiting Patrick Greenwell
- address portability Steven M. Bellovin
- Re: address portability Patrick Greenwell
- Re: address portability John Day
- Re: address portability Patrick Greenwell
- Re: Tired of Waiting Christopher Ambler
- Re: Tired of Waiting Jeff Williams
- Re: address portability Simon Spero
- Re: Tired of Waiting Christopher Ambler