Re: my posting to newdom@ar.com
"Richard J. Sexton" <richard@vrx.net> Wed, 20 August 1997 23:21 UTC
Received: from ietf.org by ietf.org id aa22360; 20 Aug 97 19:21 EDT
Received: from ns1.vrx.net by ietf.org id aa22314; 20 Aug 97 19:21 EDT
Received: from mbv1-ipl-ri3.kos.net(really [206.186.41.41]) by vrx.net
via sendmail with smtp id <m0x1K4b-0002kxC@vrx.net>
for <ietf@ietf.org>; Wed, 20 Aug 1997 19:21:57 -0400 (EDT)
(Smail-3.2.0.92 1997-Feb-9 #2 built 1997-Apr-8)
Message-Id: <m0x1K4b-0002kxC@vrx.net>
Date: Wed, 20 Aug 1997 19:21:57 -0400 (EDT)
X-Sender: richard@vrx.net
X-Mailer: Windows Eudora Light Version 1.5.2
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii"
To: perry@piermont.com
Sender: ietf-request@ietf.org
From: "Richard J. Sexton" <richard@vrx.net>
Subject: Re: my posting to newdom@ar.com
Cc: perry@piermont.com, ietf@ietf.org
Source-Info: From (or Sender) name not authenticated.
At 07:14 PM 8/20/97 -0400, Perry E. Metzger wrote: > >"Richard J. Sexton" writes: >> >Mr. Sexton, the IETF is a voluntary organization. The members have >> >decided they don't want to address the issue. You have no way to force >> >them to do so. You are free to found another organization consisting >> >of people of a different opinion. Now, could you please stop >> >broadcasting this topic to thousands of uninterested IETF members who >> >have decided they don't want to deal with this issue? >> >> Good point. Now how do you suggest the IETF members who are interested >> in the issue organize? > >I SUGGEST THEY ORGANIZE SOMEWHERE ELSE. With all due respect, Perry, you have a bit of a vested interest here, and if it's unanimous that no IETF'ers want to do anything I'll understand, but I wasn't aware your voice was authoratative for all of the IETF.
- Re: my posting to newdom@ar.com Richard J. Sexton
- Re: my posting to newdom@ar.com Perry E. Metzger
- Re: my posting to newdom@ar.com Richard J. Sexton