Re: TO COMPRESS OR NOT TO CMPRS (please reply)
EKR <ekr@terisa.com> Wed, 19 February 1997 17:54 UTC
Received: from cnri by ietf.org id aa23635; 19 Feb 97 12:54 EST
Received: from portal.ex.tis.com by CNRI.Reston.VA.US id aa22273;
19 Feb 97 12:54 EST
Received: (from majordom@localhost) by portal.ex.tis.com (8.8.2/8.8.2) id
MAA25293 for ipsec-outgoing; Wed, 19 Feb 1997 12:42:01 -0500 (EST)
Message-Id: <199702191743.JAA14968@itech.terisa.com>
X-Authentication-Warning: itech.terisa.com: Host kmac.terisa.COM didn't use
HELO protocol
To: Bob Monsour <rmonsour@earthlink.net>
cc: perry@piermont.com, ipsec@tis.com
Subject: Re: TO COMPRESS OR NOT TO CMPRS (please reply)
In-reply-to: Your message of "Wed, 19 Feb 1997 07:17:54 PST."
<3.0.32.19970219071752.0094a7e0@earthlink.net>
Date: Wed, 19 Feb 1997 09:47:37 -0800
From: EKR <ekr@terisa.com>
Sender: owner-ipsec@ex.tis.com
Precedence: bulk
> At 09:22 AM 2/19/97 -0500, Perry E. Metzger wrote: > >I see you haven't heard of SSL, eh? > > I am very aware of SSL (and it provides support for compressing prior to > encrypting). Well, sort of: There is a socket for compression to be plugged into. There are no defined compression plugs (other than null) and I don't expect there to be any for some time. -Ekr
- Re: TO COMPRESS OR NOT TO CMPRS (please reply) Bob Monsour
- Re: TO COMPRESS OR NOT TO CMPRS (please reply) EKR
- Re: TO COMPRESS OR NOT TO CMPRS (please reply) Bob Monsour
- Re: TO COMPRESS OR NOT TO CMPRS (please reply) Dennis Glatting
- Re: TO COMPRESS OR NOT TO CMPRS (please reply) Terry L. Davis, Boeing Information & Support Services, Bellevue, WA
- Re: TO COMPRESS OR NOT TO CMPRS (please reply) EKR
- Re: TO COMPRESS OR NOT TO CMPRS (please reply) Rodney Thayer
- Re: TO COMPRESS OR NOT TO CMPRS (please reply) Phil Karn
- Re: TO COMPRESS OR NOT TO CMPRS (please reply) Stephen Kent
- Re: TO COMPRESS OR NOT TO CMPRS (please reply) Phil Karn