Re: ESP revisions straw poll
Stephen Kent <kent@bbn.com> Tue, 20 May 1997 22:20 UTC
Received: from cnri by ietf.org id aa10623; 20 May 97 18:20 EDT
Received: from portal.ex.tis.com by CNRI.Reston.VA.US id aa16050;
20 May 97 18:20 EDT
Received: (from majordom@localhost) by portal.ex.tis.com (8.8.2/8.8.2) id
SAA01823 for ipsec-outgoing; Tue, 20 May 1997 18:06:11 -0400 (EDT)
X-Sender: kent@po1.bbn.com
Message-Id: <v03007833afa7804e626e@[128.89.0.110]>
In-Reply-To: <199705201542.LAA03958@jekyll.piermont.com>
References: Your message of "Tue, 20 May 1997 11:20:33 EDT."
<v0300782dafa7701b9351@[128.89.0.110]>
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii"
Date: Tue, 20 May 1997 18:12:57 -0400
To: perry@piermont.com
From: Stephen Kent <kent@bbn.com>
Subject: Re: ESP revisions straw poll
Cc: ipsec@tis.com
Sender: owner-ipsec@ex.tis.com
Precedence: bulk
Perry, I don't intend to ride roughshood over IETF procedures, and I believe my characterization of how the straw poll is being conducted is consistent with how this WG has conducted such polls in the past. As for the Memphis IETF meeting, I have been informed that the second day implementors meeting did express a clear, overwhelming intent to not support auth-only ESP. No argument there However, consistent with IETF procedures, that decision is not the final say for the WG. I could observe that when I briefed the WG attendees at the San Jose meeting there seemed to be support FOR this mode of ESP. (I admit that the minutes from that meeting don't do a great job of recording all the details, but a completely modular ESP was part of the presentation that I gave. It's also a pity that the proceedings don't include those slides!) That previous show of support (in San Jose) clearly was not the last word, else we could argue that the matter was closed at that point, four months earlier than the Memphis meetings. Steve
- Re: ESP revisions straw poll Hilarie Orman
- Re: ESP revisions straw poll Dennis Glatting
- Re: ESP revisions straw poll Stephen Kent
- Re: ESP revisions straw poll Steven M. Bellovin
- Re: ESP revisions straw poll Stephen Kent