Re: address portability

Patrick Greenwell <patrick@namesecure.com> Wed, 15 July 1998 20:00 UTC

Delivery-Date: Wed, 15 Jul 1998 16:09:44 -0400
Return-Path: cclark
Received: (from adm@localhost) by ietf.org (8.8.5/8.8.7a) id QAA23987 for ietf-outbound.10@ietf.org; Wed, 15 Jul 1998 16:00:02 -0400 (EDT)
Received: from po1.namesecure.com (qmailr@po1.namesecure.com [205.229.232.3]) by ietf.org (8.8.5/8.8.7a) with SMTP id PAA23045 for <ietf@ietf.org>; Wed, 15 Jul 1998 15:20:26 -0400 (EDT)
Received: (qmail 17074 invoked by uid 100); 15 Jul 1998 19:20:25 -0000
Date: Wed, 15 Jul 1998 12:20:25 -0700
From: Patrick Greenwell <patrick@namesecure.com>
To: John Day <day@bbn.com>
cc: "Steven M. Bellovin" <smb@RESEARCH.ATT.COM>, "Perry E. Metzger" <perry@piermont.com>, ietf@ietf.org, List@giaw.org, comments@iana.org, discussion-draft@giaw.org
Subject: Re: address portability
In-Reply-To: <v0311070db1d2ab5eb8a1@[128.89.30.6]>
Message-ID: <Pine.BSI.3.96.980715122009.16421A-100000@po1.namesecure.com>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: TEXT/PLAIN; charset="US-ASCII"

On Wed, 15 Jul 1998, John Day wrote:

> At 13:32 -0400 7/15/98, Steven M. Bellovin wrote:
> >At 09:12 AM 7/15/98 -0700, Patrick Greenwell wrote:
> >>
> >>Further, I would love to have a truly permanent, portable IP address(es).
> >>I imagine lots of folks would.
> 
> But it wouldn't be an address.
> 
> Noel, you want to explain this or is it worth it?

Oh, please do. :-)


/\/\/\/\/\/\/\/\/\/\/\/\/\/\/\/\/\/\/\/\/\/\/\/\/\/\/\/\/\/\/\/\/\/\/\/\/\/\/\
Patrick Greenwell				         (800) 299-1288 v
			   Systems Administrator	 (925) 377-1414 f
	                         NameSecure		     
\/\/\/\/\/\/\/\/\/\/\/\/\/\/\/\/\/\/\/\/\/\/\/\/\/\/\/\/\/\/\/\/\/\/\/\/\/\/\/